User talk:Iamveselin

Welcome!

Hello, Iamveselin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dakota Kai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page These Four Walls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mandy Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iamveselin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm WikiLeon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Becky Lynch without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. w^L^{<speak·check>} 22:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gail Kim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of WWE SmackDown Women's Champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asuka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of dashes

You're using the wrong type of dash on the articles, as seen here, here, here, and here (and the last having unnecessary trivial detail). For these instances, the correct dash is the hyphen (also known as the minus sign, up by the zero on the keyboard). The dash you're using is the en-dash, which is just used for ranges, like a number range (e.g., 1–10). --JDC808 ♫ 14:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop ignoring what I've been telling you. You are using the wrong dash. If you ignore this again, you will be reported. --JDC808 ♫ 11:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we're going through this again. Nearly a year later, you are still using wrong dashes, which I do not understand. All you have to do is press one key by the 0 on your keyboard (you are making extra effort to put the en-dash, which is wrong for where you've been using it). I've had to correct this on multiple articles now and it's quite annoying. The last time, you were blocked because of your failure to communicate to resolve this. Don't ignore these messages. --JDC808 ♫ 04:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HOW are you still using the incorrect dashes? Makes absolutely no sense. Are you doing this on purpose or what? --JDC808 ♫ 20:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlotte Flair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Money in the Bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Becky Lynch

Please look at Talk:Becky Lynch. Ikhtiar H (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Charlotte Flair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lita

Rosemary (wrestler) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Table

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Becky Lynch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ImmortalWizard(chat) 19:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Becky Lynch, you may be blocked from editing. ImmortalWizard(chat) 17:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Maria Kanellis, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. STATic message me! 23:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

P.S. Didn't want to do this, but you are ignoring warnings. --JDC808 ♫ 00:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions alert for professional wrestling

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to professional wrestling. Before continuing to make edits that involve professional wrestling, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dash it all

There is a discussion about your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editing_by_User:Iamveselin. To me, the problem is less about the dashes than the lack of communicating. In a collaborative project like this one, communication is essential. Please partake in this discussion and address the matter of the dashes.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the fact that you have edited since Dlohcierekim's message above, you have still failed to respond to the complaints about your edits. I have therefore blocked you for three days for failure to collaborate, failure to respond to other users' concerns, and failure to use edit summaries (which is a subset of failure to communicate). If you don't respond to this block or if you persist in the same conduct after the block expires, the next block will be indefinite. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:52, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: This guy is at it again, intentionally changing the correct dashes to incorrect dashes across multiple articles. Currently in the midst of fixing them. --JDC808 ♫ 21:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Largely mooted. If further discussion on this point is needed, may I suggest continuing it HERE so as to keep it all on one thread?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your block, Bbb23. In nearly ten years of editing, I have never once used anything other than the easiest to find keyboard horizonal line for a hyphen, an en dash, an em dash or a minus sign. Nobody has ever once criticized me for my typographic failures and nobody brought it up at my RfA. It is a typographic triviality and any editor who wants to change these little horizontal lines can do so. Using edit summaries is recommended but is not mandatory. Discussing with MOS obsessed editors who harass content creators about typographic trivialities is also not required. Please reconsider this block. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: Maybe our keyboards are different, but the easiest sign to use on mine is the ordinary hyphen. If I want to add an em or en dash, I have to work at it. If this were an instance where the user was using hyphens instead of dashes, I could understand your point better, but they are changing hyphens to dashes and then not responding to other users' complaints. I'm hardly an MOS expert, and both as an editor and as an administrator I try to stay away from MOS disputes, which I often find lame, but in this case, there is enough disruption by the user to justify a block for failure to collaborate/communicate/respond. As for edit summaries, I of course know that edit summaries are not required. Unfortunately, many experienced users don't use them. However, here the failure to use edit summaries is just one more element of the user's failure to communicate. We have zero idea what is going through their brain.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The joke comments at ANI obscured the issue which does not concern wonkery such as distinctions between em dashes, en dashes, and minus signs. The issue is explained at #Use of dashes above with four diffs which show small edits that replace hyphens with en dashes in standard hyphenated phrases such as "two-time". That is completely wrong, not MOS wonkery. Johnuniq (talk) 07:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: Your entire post contains not a single response to the reasoning given for the block. The user now has three days to realize that they can't contentiously edit while ignoring discussion. User:Bbb23 made it clear that the concern was over the conduct, not the content. Is it appropriate to ignore a good-faith user's efforts to correct your behavior? Aren't you supposed to either change (if you're wrong) or explain why you're not changing (if you're right)? 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:1D04:95C1:5D9B:E176 (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: Like I said in the ANI report multiple times, you were getting hung up with the dashes and overlooked the real issue that this user flat out ignored attempts of communication. The failure of communication is why this user was blocked, not because of their misuse of dashes. If you had read the entire report, you would have known that their failure to communicate was why the report was made (I actually reread the report and you never addressed this user's lack of communication and instead mocked the issue of the dashes). --JDC808 ♫ 05:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When evaluating how disruptive an editor's failure to communicate is, I consider it important to evaluate the substance of the issue under discussion. The body of my 9+ years of contributions to this enyclopedia shows that I consistently promote level-headed communication among editors. If this editor was failing to communicate about an issue of actual encyclopedic content, as opposed to an MOS issue, I would certainly take the communications issue much more seriously. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is encyclopedic content more serious than MOS issues? Sure, but it really shouldn't matter what the issue is if the user flat out ignores attempts of communication and continues to make the same edits over and over and over again. --JDC808 ♫ 06:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asuka (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NXT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your post on my User page

In regard to this post, that is the completely wrong place to post that. If you're trying to communicate with me (or any other editor for that matter), you post on the talk page, NOT the user page. Secondly, we don't attack people with the uncivility that you did in your post there. That will surely get you blocked if you want to continue that behavior (I'm actually surprised you even made a response because you've been completely silent on this issue for literally two years).

To respond to what you posted, I have no issues with what you have written on articles. What I have an issue with is your misuse of dashes, because for some god forsaken reason, you keep using the wrong dash, and it makes absolutely no sense at all why you keep doing it. You were even blocked from editing because of your failure to communicate to explain your reasoning why you continuously would make this intentional mistake. To add to that, you've actually gone through articles and intentionally changed the correct usage of a hyphen to an en-dash.

Look at this example:

pay-per-view (hyphenated)
pay–per–view (en-dash)
pay—per—view (em-dash)

Do you see the difference? For whatever reasons, you keep doing the second one, which is absolutely wrong (the third would be even worse). An en-dash is used for ranges, like a number range (e.g., 1–10), not to hyphenate words (the em-dash is something that you can use in the place of parenthesis). This dash issue is something so easily fixed on your end that it baffles me how you continue to make this stupid mistake after literally two years. The first one is what you should be doing, and all you have to do is hit the hyphen/minus key right next to the number 0 on your keyboard (and if you're on mobile, your only option from a mobile keyboard is the regular hyphen/minus). What you're doing is intentionally hitting the en-dash from the bottom row of commands on the edit text box. Stop doing that. It's that simple. Use the hyphen/minus key on your keyboard. --JDC808 ♫ 00:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How?

Over three years later and you are STILL using the wrong type of dash. Please explain why you do this because it makes absolutely 0 sense. I even gave you examples of how to correctly use the dash in my post above from over 2 years ago. This is absolutely baffling. JDC808 ♫ 03:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's championships in WWE, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rockin' Robin and Bayley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dakota Kai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asuka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's championships in WWE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lowell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]