User talk:Iamtrhino

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Iamtrhino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Aurangzeb does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Abhishek ^Talk 08:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Aurangzeb. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Abhishek ^Talk 08:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Aurangzeb, you may be blocked from editing. — Abhishek ^Talk 09:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Pakistan Air Force. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. → Caution: Please note that BLOGs are not considered by Wikipedia as a reliable source of information for any official entities, as under the rules of Wikipedia BLOGs are classified as Self-published source, meaning that they are not verifiable and is also not permissible for citations purposes on article pages. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 08:34, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Chhatrapati-Shivaji.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chhatrapati-Shivaji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Aurangzeb-history.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Aurangzeb-history.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Einstein-india.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Einstein-india.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Julius-india.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Julius-india.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Hinduism has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Calabe1992 (talk) 15:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hinduism. Calabe1992 (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just keep adding this - it's blatantly copied>pasted. Calabe1992 (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Max-muller-india.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Max-muller-india.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ghori-ghor.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ghori-ghor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ghori.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ghori.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Shivaji-bhawanij.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Shivaji-bhawanij.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rajeshivaji.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rajeshivaji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Iamtrhino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

1.23.155.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

ignoring image warnings

Blocking administrator: Feydey (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked, you are blocked directly for uploading inappropriate images despite repeated warnings Jac16888 ^Talk 10:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtrhino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely sorry for ignoring the image warnings. Actually I am new to wikipidea. Please unblock my account(iamtrhino) and IP address this time. Next time I will be careful. I shall be thankful to you.

Decline reason:

Please explain what you will do differently, so that we can see that you underrstand the reason for the block. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Once again, I have re-instated the declined unblock - you may not remove these while the block is in force.

In order to be unblocked, you will need to explain what you understand to be the reason behind your block, and how it will not recur. WP:COPYRIGHT of images is an important policy - uploaded copyrighted images puts the entire project at legal risk. Please explain your understanding of your block, and how you will ensure that problems do not recur if unblocked. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 17:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtrhino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet. Please unblock me or atleast tell me the time I will be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Both behavioural evidence and a checkuser report indicate that you have abused multiple accounts, quite apart from the fact that you evidently have edited in an attempt to impose a particular point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtrhino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been shown any evidence. My account name is 'iamtrhino'.. Account with name 'Arinjatt' is actually of my younger brother. I told him to do certain edits.. But he was new in this wikipidea. So he was not aware of the rules, thats why he would have violated rules. Blocking him is understandable, but why was my account blocked ? This has been an injustice to me. Please help me. Kindly unblock me. I request the respectable admins to give me their e-mail id , so that I can talk to them .

Decline reason:

On top of WP:SOCK (there are other accounts which you are not disclosing to us), WP:MEAT and WP:BROTHER. Elockid ^(Talk) 16:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtrhino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know anything about other accounts. 'Arinjatt' was the profile of my brother, may be he used more profiles also. But my question is- Why I am getting punishment for what I have not done ? If my brother violated any rule, then his profile should be blocked, but why was my profile blocked ?

Decline reason:

First, Wikipedia does not do punishment - this block is protection for the project. Second, see WP:BROTHER. Third, based on your behaviour alone this block is necessary - your massive copyright violations prove it, and this block can be changed to a copyright block, if you wish. However, when more than one account make the exact same edits to the exact same articles this is clearly either WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT and your continued calls of "my brother" are hollow. I'm pretty much prepared to remove talkpage access if you keep this up. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtrhino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@ BWilkins Yes , Please change my block reason to copyright violation, if u wish. At least I will then be blocked for a proper reason. However, I was earlier banned for 7 days for copyright violation (ignoring image warnings). But after that ban, I didn't violate copyright rules. Whenever I uploaded images, I started mentioning the author, source and URL, which I think is necessary for uploading images. Now its upto you that you want to unblock me or not. If u don't want to unblock me, then atleast change my block reason.

Decline reason:

This is not an actual decline as this is not an actual unblock request. The block reasoning is now for both unresponded-to copyright violations and the WP:SOCK/WP:MEAT violations. I have also locked your talkpage, as you're simply saying the same things again and again, and not listening to any advice provided, and thus are abusing the unblock process(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Perhaps you do not clearly understand what WP:SOCK means:

You are a person, entitled to only one account.
Creating a second account to edit the same articles is sockpuppetry.
If your account is blocked, you may not edit with either a) another account, or b) anonymously using an IP address - doing so is evading a block using sockpuppetry.

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.