User talk:Iamthetruecreator

October 2014

Hello, I'm Kante4. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Karim Benzema because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The official RM ref says otherwise, so stop adding it. Kante4 (talk) 12:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Kante4. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Kante4 (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:02, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Lewandowski. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hi, I'm Breakfast221. I noticed that you made two edits to the Disturbed (band) article, one in November and one in December, changing the amount of albums sold from 13 million to 15 million, and then to 20 million. Would you be able to provide a source for that? It seems the source that was placed there by a previous user is broken anyway, so I'm not sure if the original 13 million was accurate. I will mention this in the Talk page for the article as well, but I just wanted to inquire where you got this information. Breakfast221 (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Linkin Park has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Linkin Park was changed by Iamthetruecreator (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2015-02-08T15:25:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at In the End, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Rising Tied. Binksternet (talk) 07:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at In the End shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Do not violate WP:MULTIPLE by editing logged out as IP 190.83.246.241. Your edits taken together are a violation of WP:3RR. You will want to self-revert to avoid getting blocked. This is your chance... Binksternet (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fifty Shades of Grey (film)

Please participate in the discussion about the overall critical reception on talk page rather than edit warring. You've been warned by me and another user. This is my final warning. Callmemirela (talk) 23:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and disruption, incl. IP editing, as you did at In the End. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 04:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]