User talk:Iamthere/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Iamthere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Hi, I noticed you created an article on Ganapathi Sachchidananda. I've gone ahead and made a lot of changes to the article and I think you'll agree that it looks a lot better now. Any more sources you could add would be even better. Anyway, thanks for your contibutions! --- Deville (Talk) 17:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Master E.K.

Please see out notability guideline at WP:BIO and our speedy deletion criteria at WP:CSD. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating this article. Recreation of deleted material could be grounds for blocking. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World teacher trust

A tag has been placed on World teacher trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kinu ^t/_c 19:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Master C.V.V

A tag has been placed on Master C.V.V, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Master C.V.V, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mastercvv.com/about.html. As a copyright violation, Master C.V.V appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Master C.V.V has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Master C.V.V. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Master C.V.V, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Dan0 00 19:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just about rewrite in my own words..Just trying to pool in all the information...I also understand about cpoyright laws and blah blah just Hang On

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeatedly recreating deleted content. If you disagree with the deletions, you can take the matters to WP:DRV, but just repeatedly recreating the material in question does not resolve the matter. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just started to write the material in my own words. Just because you are ignorant, the information you dont know doesnt become patent nonsense. I hope you have the sensibility to give sufficient time to comeup with a original article. Try to understand the world is a bigger place with more information than your little mind can comprehend. Lift the block and let me write the article

Please read the links provided above, such as what constitutes an assertion of notability, information about copyrights, and the steps to take if you contest an article's deletion. And that's quite the attitude... calling others "ignorant" and of "little mind" is not the proper course of action, and only serves to tarnish any possible positive contributions you have. Please read WP:CIVIL. And if you need a space to collect information and write it in your own words, consider using a subpage or three. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. This is a bad idea. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they are put here because other editors think that your behavior needs improvement, and we're giving you the courtesy of letting you know. Please respond by changing your behavior, and please stop removing the warnings. Thank you. You are welcome to archive your warnings, if you wish I can help you with that, just ask here. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]