User talk:IamthatIam

Welcome!

Handy Links

Hello IamthatIam, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you enjoy yourself being a Wikipedian, Remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). Wikipedia is a really great place to be as long as you abide by the rules, including the big one, What Wikipedia Is Not. But as long as you contribute useful information and don't make a mess, nobody will yell at you, you could even rise to the rank of administrator. If you need help, see Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be along to help.

Enjoy Your Time, Bdude (talk)

FNORD

Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 17:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discordian Works

I put the problems with someone gutting this article up for mediation at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-02-10_Discordian_Works I hope I stated the case clearly and without sounding angry even though I am. I think that wise heads can see what's being done for themselves. Nothing justifies cutting it when the vote was KEEP! Binky The WonderSkull 05:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Discordian Works

Same message also posted to User:Shii

Could you and Shii please take it to the talk page? This warring is not constructive and I think it'd be best if you agree to disagree and talk it out. This is running close to a 3RR violation for the both of you. Teke^(talk) 05:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted it once. That's close to 3RR?

Sorry, I just checked Wikipedia's policy. You are right, Teke, it is getting close to 3RR because it isn't limited to reverts by one person. But I will ask you to consider what has been happening here, as described below. We've tried resolving this on the talk page [1] (where you can see Ashibaka/Shii's "Don't be a jerk" comment), and even in a mediation cabal [2] You can see there that the person who said the case should be closed was the very person the case was against. Is there a way we can make a formal case about this problem? IamthatIam 07:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And check the history--Ashibaka now Shii edited the article, then when DrJon reverted Shii's edits, Shii put the article up for deletion. Decision was keep, but Shii has continued to delete virtually all the article, making its very existance pointless, which is what Shii has been threatening to do all along. There was even an informal plea for help on this, and Shii lambasted that too. I'm about to do a second revert. IamthatIam 06:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps, I added some new content. IamthatIam 07:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you added any reliable sources yet? If not I will reduce the article to a redirect. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 06:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 207.195.244.193 lifted or expired. Request handled by: ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 06:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who Bitemebuggerboy is. I guess this is a shared IP. IamthatIam 02:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RfAr

I was looking over the case that you filed, and after reading the few talk pages, I think that you should actually name a few more people who have been involved in the discussion/argument. Since the case is about user conduct surrounding an article, I think that you may want to seek more input from others? Just my $.02. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 07:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penwhale, thanks for your suggestion. Unfortunately, Drjon has gotten so burned out on this ridiculous mess that he said he has no interest in participating; Reverend Loveshade remains neutral because the article talks about him; Rev. Bootie says no one will listen to him anyway because he hasn't done enough edits. I think some people have gotten too burned out to fight. Fortunately, regardless of what happens, Arbitration Committee member JPGordon said the article Discordian Works has reliable sources! Now if the user who's been causing problems will just respect a member of the Arbitration Committee, victory has already happened. IamthatIam 16:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Chao the mary.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chao the mary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:BLP/N

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Kerry Wendell Thornley/Grace Zabriskie. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]