User talk:Iampython

Welcome!

Hello, Iampython, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prakash Neupane (musician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prakash Neupane (musician), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://prakashneupane.com/index.php/about/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 09:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Iampython (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21141 was submitted on Apr 08, 2018 12:24:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iampython (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia, My account should be unblocked because it has been blocked deu to sockpuppet investigation and being sockpuppet of user called Gaurav456. First of all i want to make you all sure that i am not Gaurav456 neither i know that person. I am a wikipedia editing crazy guy and i get blocked and when i request blocking admin to request for unblock about my account Iampython he used to ban my ips instead of replying me or providing me the strong evedience. and the next reason: Everyone wants to be a good editor and admin of future on wikipedia and i had kept maybe admin on future tag on my wiki user profile. They scan and match that with another user account called Adamsmith something i dont know that guy too and the third and last reason is abou i re-create the page called Prakash Neupane which was previously created by sockpuppet blocked user called adamsmith something cause i dont know his full user id and mistakenly i added same ref links which he added and some words matched every new user on wikipedia wanted to learn from other user i found some of the old things of that page from deletionpedia of wiki and added cause of that case also they may blocked me but the fact is that i dont know the gaurav456 and never known him in my life yet and i dont wanna know him in future too. I love to edit articles and use wikipedia. but my account got blocked so i am really badly feeling sad. instead of encouraging they bllocked. so please i request you to unblock my account 🙂 one love peace. Update:- And this ip is again blocked by NeilN can’t i req for my own unblock?

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the confirmed sockpuppetry between this account and AdamSmith12 (talk · contribs) and NepalMyMotherland (talk · contribs). Additionally, whether or not the IP address is blocked should be irrelevant to you, because your account is blocked. Until your account is unblocked, you cannot edit. Yamla (talk) 11:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iampython (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected Wikipedia Admins, I should be unblocked because i found in my user page that i'm blocked being sockpuppet of User:Gaurav456 . When i request for my first unblock Admin told me to addressed the confirmed sockpuppetry between my account and AdamSmith12 (talk · contribs) and NepalMyMotherland (talk · contribs) first of all i want to let you all know that i don't know these accounts. I am here to edit on wikipedia and wanted to help to make it better. As i mention previously I re-created the article Prakash Neupane (musician) while creating account i copied some source from deletionpedia which i found on google. Like being a new editor on wikipedia i wanted to learn something i was unknown about the sockpuppet policy / i would be block like this in future by recreating wiki article with same source. And about ip i use the ISP of Worldlink Communications which is quite famous in Kathmandu, Nepal and many peoples use worldlink as their ISP. You can match their ip to mine. i am wiki lover person from Nepal and love to edit on wikipedia so please unblock me. We are humans, humans makes mistakes knowingly or unknowingly please allow me to use this account again. Iampython (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

per Mz7's note below. Aside from the socking, I would be willing to consider unblocking under these conditions in 6 months time, per the WP:SO. 1) Agree not to edit about Prakash Neupane. 2) State your understanding or WP:COI . 3) Read and heed WP:PAID. 4) Disclose all other accounts you have used or coordinated edits with. 5) Affirm you will not add any content to Wikipedia that is copyrighted elsewhere. 6) Explain WP:promo as it relates to your editing --Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrators, please see the behavioral evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gaurav456/Archive. In addition to being technically indistinguishable from NepalMyMotherland, this user is part of a host of other CU-confirmed accounts that repeatedly recreated the Prakash Neupane article over the course of the last few months. It is just vanishingly unlikely that this is all a big coincidence. I do not believe Iampython's statement that they are unrelated to these accounts, and accordingly, since they are not being honest about all of the Wikipedia accounts they've used, I would suggest that this unblock request be denied. (I won't deny it myself because I filed the SPI.) Mz7 (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: I understand you and i agree not to do any edit about Prakash Neupane. According to WP:COI i haven’t edited or contribue about myself or my friends or family and in future i wont do that. I have read and i’ve understood about WP:PAID and i’ve not done that before neither i will do that in future. I affirm not to that i will not add any content to wikipedia that is copyrighted elsewhere. I agree to disclose all other accounts but i’ve not even one and about WP:PROMO being a new editor i didnot understand well about wikipedia so maybe WP:PROMO happened on my edits . By knowingly i didn’t did such type of edits. So, please i request you to unblock my account. Iampython (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iampython, you have missed one important detail. I said I would be willing to consider unblock if conditions were met after you had stayed away from Wikipedia for 6 months. Staring with your last edit. That would be today. Please do not edit or sock for six months and then apply for the WP:SO. Sorry I did not make that clear. Bye-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

@Dlohcierekim: It's Been Six Months And I Wanted To Be Back On Wikipedia. Iampython (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Follow the instructions. If you aren't willing to do that, you are clearly demonstrating we should not unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Sorry I Am Doing That Following WP:SO.

@Dlohcierekim: --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I set forth the following conditions for unblocking--

1) Agree not to edit about Prakash Neupane.

2) State your understanding or WP:COI .

3) Read and heed WP:PAID.

4) Disclose all other accounts you have used or coordinated edits with.

5) Affirm you will not add any content to Wikipedia that is copyrighted elsewhere.

6) Explain WP:promo as it relates to your editing.

You would also need to describe the sort of constructive edits you would make. Thanks-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SO requires six months of zero edits. This user has never remotely approached that. TheRedBox (talk · contribs) was editing last month. I would strongly oppose an unban at this time. --Yamla (talk) 21:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]