User talk:Iamhere786

Welcome!

Hello, Iamhere786, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 12:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dhobi Ghat (film)

Wikipedia is not a soapbox to push your political opinions. The nationality of the terrorists is completely irrelevant to this article, not mentioned by the source, and should not be included. Active Banana (^bananaphone 20:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dhobi Ghat (film). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Active Banana (^bananaphone 20:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war was started by some IPs, not me.Iamhere786 (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the links about edit warring? "He started it" is not a valid excuse. 22:35, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Your continued edit warring to push your POV with content unsubstantiated by the sources has been reported: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Iamhere786_reported_by_Active_Banana_.28bananaphone_.28Result:_.29 Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 15:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's No Original Research and verification policies

Re: your edit summary "its in continuation of already mentioned thing, so there is no question of it being irrelevent, and its a link itself, doesn't need any source". You are in fact wrong. Wikipedia article content must be specifically stated within the source and not cobbled together from multiple sources. The source for this article mentions the attacks, but it does NOT EVER mention the nationalities or suspected nationalities of the attackers and so we will not include information that is not in our sources in an article.

In addition, you have not provided anything close to any rationale as to how the nationality of the attackers has ANY RELAVANCE AT ALL to the delays experienced by the filming crew. Your insistance of pushing such irrelevant information into the article is an obvious attempt to hang non-related content to push a political/national point of view. Active Banana (^bananaphone 18:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]