User talk:Iamaumjha

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nick Aldis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nick Aldis was changed by Iamaumjha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91118 on 2018-08-27T07:22:16+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhuvan Bam. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bhuvan Bam was changed by Iamaumjha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971646 on 2018-08-27T07:25:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhuvan Bam. “ CAPITAL PATROLLER ”^{☎ 911} 07:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:29, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamaumjha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I'm not sure why I was blocked nearly 4 years ago, I had not read wikipedia's rules back then, could you please unblock my account now? I've read the rules and thoroughly understand them now Iamaumjha (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I didn't occur to you that peppering a biographical article with "porn" and other puerile nonsense might be against Wikipedia's "rules"? You're going to have to do better than that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.