User talk:Iamascorp

Only the people within this office have access to this account. The individual who originaly created the article was having problems with Wikipeditrix. She has a problem when it comes to her relaying of her suggestions. I have read your input and I appreciate it. We have only tried to help to reduce the stresses of this situation. Hopefully it has been resolved.

License tagging for Image:Caroline.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caroline.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Caroline image.

Would've been a rather nice gesture if you'd've named your image something else, rather than just overwriting the image I was using for Caroline.--Jeff 03:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One account per person, please.

"Only the people within this office have access to this account."? "We"? Please read Wikipedia:Sock_puppet#'Role'_accounts. One account per person, please. Uncle G 00:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Issues over IAMAS Corporation

Hi, I've just seen the message you've left me. I haven' had a great look through the page's history yet, but I can see what you mean about there being an odd numebr of tags on the page. The best first step would be to use the talk page of the article to describe why you thik the tags are wrong and then remove them. If there are replaced again then ask whoever removes them to discuss their changes on the talk page. Iif however, as I get the impression from what you say this doesn't appear to work then I'll advise you on what to do next. But use the talk page first, its purpose is to discuss changes to the page. --Wisd e n17 00:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wisden17, thank you for your imput. We have tried to remove the tags and ask Wikipediatrix to explain why she is tagging things. It does not work with her. We actually had to get aggressive with her and demand that she explain herself. Finally she gave a half baked answer and we ammended the page again to show the cite. We also used a cite that took the reader to Mr. Cook's web page to show the Crabbottom USA program mentioned in the article. She took the link off and tagged it again. We will try to put the cites back in and see if she will leave it alone, but I think we are going to run into trouble with her again. Anidote had a problem with her at one point and you can look on the talk page to see that he reprimanded her for tagging things without giving explaination. She shot back at him telling him, "Why do we have tags if we can't use them?" It is very frustrating dealing with her. Then when you do she cops an attitude and turns it back on you. I just do not feel this is a good Wikipedia standard of editing. We have another article for Caroline Keller that she has refered over for deletion and does not explain her position on why. Maybe you could look at that article and make some suggestions as to what we shoudl do with it. Again, thank you for your time and understanding in the situation. IAMAS Corporation 1:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:USERNAME

Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it is either inflammatory, deliberately confusing, designed to impersonate legitimate users, or otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking policy for more information). You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username, and in a constructive manner. See Wikipedia:Username for guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may edit your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you.

Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible — if this doesn't happen within an hour or so, please email an administrator and explain the situation (see the list of administrators).

If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions: (1) Add {{unblock-un|new username}} to your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page. (2) Soon, an admin may come to unblock you. (3) You will have 24 hours since the unblock to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be re-blocked. Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account.

Spcifically here, "Accounts with usernames that advertise a particular website, company, etc. (e.g. "visit [name of url]" ) are discouraged and may be blocked." The use of this username is tantamount to advertising and has been blocked. pschemp | talk 13:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamascorp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Pschemp, You have blocked me from contributing and I believe this should have been discussed before activating. The IAMAS Corporation is a media based company with learning institutions throughout the world and has American based companies within the United States that does nothing but artist management and development. We have offices in 19 states throughout the country. One of the offices is located in Monroe, NC which could be found on David L Cook's web page. I never knew that a company that represents an artist could not contribute to factual information about said artists as long as it was not press or POV? As far as the tags that were put on the pages for IAMAS Corporation and AMAAA about being Hoax's, that is inaccurate information. The only thing that was not done was a full disclosure of locations for the various offices. It was only discussed as to where our learning institutions could be found. IAMAS Corporation 11:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see Wikipedia:Username#Inappropriate usernames: “Usernames intended for spamming or advertisement:' Accounts with usernames that advertise a particular website, company, etc. (e.g. "visit [name of url]" ) are discouraged and may be blocked.” Username is inappropriate, please refister something else. --Avi 16:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Replaceable fair use Image:Davidlcook.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Davidlcook.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mortermer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mortermer.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Davidlcook.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Davidlcook.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mortermer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mortermer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Cook (musician)

Hello Iamascorp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David Cook (musician) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^{Atsme📞📧} 01:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]