User talk:Iamamoron!

Hello, Iamamoron!! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

File source problem with File:Channel 9.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Channel 9.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Channel 9.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Channel 9.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DWDM 95.5

Can you find sources that DWDM 95.5 returned on air? Superastig (talk) 04:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SkyCable edits

Why did you reverted my edits here? I have reverted the edits of a vandal which he claims that NBN and IBC has been rebranded to "Channel 4" and "DZTV" respectively and you have reverted it to the vandalized version. -WayKurat (talk) 06:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did in the article List of radio stations in Metro Manila. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem

Edits like this will not be tolerated. Never attack your fellow editors. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing. Got it? ⬅ ❝Redvers❞ 09:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to DZTV-TV. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WayKurat (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7-day block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text

{{unblock|Iamamoron! (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)I saw something wrong on other articles and I admit that I done vandalism on articles and I just invented that idea because I am testing it and forgot to undo it and keep on redoing my false editsIamamoron! (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)}}

below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note to other admins

Feel free to modify this block without contacting me. PhilKnight (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My False Edits

I admit that I am vandalising DZTV-TV. I just invented that idea.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamamoron! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Iamamoron! (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)I saw something wrong on other articles and I admit that I done vandalism on articles and I just invented that idea because I am testing it and forgot to undo it and keep on redoing my false editsIamamoron! (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Declined. You've admitted your vandalism, but you need to apologise before you can be unblocked early. Ged UK 09:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have now extended your block for a month from today for block evasion using an IP address to edit this userpage. Ged UK 09:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ABOUT THE BLOCK CONCERNING THE BLOCK EVASION

Iamamoron! (talk) 11:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)I have used the same IP address that I did not know that it is mine. I did it because I am blocked during that time.Iamamoron! (talk) 11:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you edited Wikipedia during a block using an IP address. That is block evasion, hence the extension. If you wish to appeal, use the {{unblock}} template as you did before, and another administrator will review it. Ged UK 13:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blocked you indefinitely as you have again edited your userpage using an IP. Editing using IP addresses while blocked is block evasion, and you've now done it again. As before, if you wish to appeal, use the unblock template above. Ged UK 09:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Am I still blocked?

Hello, administrators and to those who blocked my before, ONE QUESTION FOR YOU: AM I STILL BLOCKED?

Yes, because of your repeated block evasion. If you wish to be unblocked, use the unblock template that you used before. Ged UK 12:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]