User talk:Iam2yearsold

Welcome!

Hello, Iam2yearsold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Surinam Airways did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:34, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Surinam Airways, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Surinam Airways. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iam2yearsold, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Iam2yearsold! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 16:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Surinam Airways. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:14, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iam2yearsold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know much about Wikipedia. If you tell me what to do and not to do I will not do anything bad like disruptive editing again if you tell me what that is and if you tell me how to reference.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

While blocked, read and study Referencing for beginners. Remove the lies from your user page and your user talk page. Please consider changing your misleading user name. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it

Thanks User:Cullen328 for helping me out with how to know about references. Iam2yearsold (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iam2yearsold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not cause disruptive editing and I will not say disruptive things on the teahouse. I will also stop adding unsourced content to ANY articles and stop doing that repeatedly. I will also use reliable sources and not create stuff up and ref new information. I have read the guide to appealing block and I understand everything I have done (including my user page and username name) are wrong.

Decline reason:

Your post below is enough reason to leave you blocked at this time. I urge you to heed Yamla's advice. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for persistent addition of unsourced content. You need to explain WP:RS and WP:CITE in your own words, if you wish to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla why have you not unblocked me yet? Iam2yearsold (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be completely inappropriate to unblock you. You haven't even attempted to follow the instructions given, and you've shown yourself to be generally disruptive. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the instructions, read it then. Iam2yearsold (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you then stupid Yamla Iam2yearsold (talk) 18:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended, talk page access revoked to give you a chance to cool off. Note any further violations will almost certainly result in an indefinite block. Please consider this your last opportunity to show yourself willing and able to be a productive contributor to Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]