User talk:Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou?
 | This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
Hello!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope that I don't seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: could be seen as offensive and/or disruptive. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your views, for instance, your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
There are several options available to you:
- We can talk about it, here.
- You can abandon the contributions made under this name and create a new account that meets our username policy and addresses the concern(s) noted above.
- Or, if you want to keep your contributions history under a new name, then you should visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the instructions there.
If we can't resolve this on our own, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process. Thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Juliancolton. I chose this user name to encourage people to be more open about their biases. Biases are something that we all have. It doesn't matter where you are from, how much money you have, the color of your skin, etc. We all have them. It's a fact of life. As my name suggests, I am very open about my own biases. My name is intended to encourage others to do the same thing. Let me know if you have any more questions.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Userboxes and overt statements on the userpage are perhaps the most popular ways of stating one's biases (I use both extensively). Instead, all your userpage displays is a single quote by another editor, with no context and nothing to indicate what your admitted biases are. How does this constitute being "very open about my own biases"? --Orange Mike | Talk 23:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your sincere concern. I am currently working on a page that details my biases. If you like, I can notify you when it is complete.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 23:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Userboxes and overt statements on the userpage are perhaps the most popular ways of stating one's biases (I use both extensively). Instead, all your userpage displays is a single quote by another editor, with no context and nothing to indicate what your admitted biases are. How does this constitute being "very open about my own biases"? --Orange Mike | Talk 23:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Juliancolton. I chose this user name to encourage people to be more open about their biases. Biases are something that we all have. It doesn't matter where you are from, how much money you have, the color of your skin, etc. We all have them. It's a fact of life. As my name suggests, I am very open about my own biases. My name is intended to encourage others to do the same thing. Let me know if you have any more questions.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Your user page quote
[edit]Do you really think this is appropriate? You are in conflict with this editor and to do something like that which would only serve to antagonize him does not seem to me to be the best way of bringing this conflict to a satisfactory conclusion. In the interests of civility and cooperation, I ask you to remove the quote. Gamaliel (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have removed the arguably offensive, yet sincerely descriptive, word "funny" from the preamble to the quote, and have further removed the source of the quote's name. Thank you for your concern.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 23:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, at least it's a step in the right direction. Thank you for taking it. Gamaliel (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, it is arguably much much more than principles of "civility" would require. The only thing that was arguably uncivil about it was my labeling it a "funny" quote (which it is.....hilariously funny). Presumably, I could leave the quote up there with its source as long as I removed the funny language. The person who said it has no privacy interest in what he has posted on a public board. So, in response to your snippy comment above, it is not a "step in the right direction," it is an overwhelmingly nice gesture to another who arguably has done nothing to receive it. I find it strange that you and him edit all the same pages and you feel it necessary to come to my page and express your sensitive feelings about my posting his quote on my user page. Very strange indeed.
- You haven't begun to see snippy yet. There is no privacy issue, the issue is civility, and that quote serves no conceivable purpose but to antagonize a user you are currently in conflict with. If you feel he has not followed policy in his dealings with you, complain to me or another administrator or to a relevant noticeboard. This sort of silly retaliation is not called for, and if he requests it, I will remove the quote. Gamaliel (talk) 02:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- "You haven't begun to see snippy yet?" You are being very antagonistic and uncivil. Please stop. The quote is no longer attributable to any user. Therefore, removing the quote from my user page would be a clear abuse of your power. Again, please try and keep civil. If you continue to be disruptive and antagonistic, I will be forced to contact other administrators. Thank you for your cooperation.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 02:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Strike that. I have decided I'm going to go ahead and report you based on what you have already done. This is your notice.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 02:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please give me a link to the report when you've finished it. Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Gamaliel. The report is subject line 36 on WP: ANI
- Please give me a link to the report when you've finished it. Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't begun to see snippy yet. There is no privacy issue, the issue is civility, and that quote serves no conceivable purpose but to antagonize a user you are currently in conflict with. If you feel he has not followed policy in his dealings with you, complain to me or another administrator or to a relevant noticeboard. This sort of silly retaliation is not called for, and if he requests it, I will remove the quote. Gamaliel (talk) 02:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, it is arguably much much more than principles of "civility" would require. The only thing that was arguably uncivil about it was my labeling it a "funny" quote (which it is.....hilariously funny). Presumably, I could leave the quote up there with its source as long as I removed the funny language. The person who said it has no privacy interest in what he has posted on a public board. So, in response to your snippy comment above, it is not a "step in the right direction," it is an overwhelmingly nice gesture to another who arguably has done nothing to receive it. I find it strange that you and him edit all the same pages and you feel it necessary to come to my page and express your sensitive feelings about my posting his quote on my user page. Very strange indeed.
- Well, at least it's a step in the right direction. Thank you for taking it. Gamaliel (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently I have been railroaded by being accused of being a sockpuppet of one Biaswarrior. Could someone help me to get my IP address compared with his to prove that I am not him? PLEASE? I created this account while at a hotel in Charlotte, NC but am now back home in Virginia. The only possible way that he/she and I could have the same IP is if he just happened to be at the same hotel and just happened to register with Wikipedia. The odds of that happening are like a billion to one, so please someone help me figure out how to compare my IP with his to show I'm not him, or else help me show that I am in fact back in VA and could not possibly be wherever he is.Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? (talk) 21:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- There was a checkuser done on the investigation and the results are found here. [[1]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 21:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Userbox
[edit]I just removed your userbox. Although you've got some leeway as to what can be on your userpage, anything polemic cannot be, per WP:NOT. I removed it.
Naluboutes, Nalubotes Aeria gloris, Aeria gloris12:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have restored the userbox. It is well within the bounds of acceptability, even if one does not agree with the sentiments within. Horologium (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)