User talk:I was a water boy

I was a water boy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi I was a water boy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

can we talk in the talk page so an edit war wont happen?

can we talk in the talk page to gain concensus before the edit war? PastaEditor2 (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

we can but 4 editors have objected to the additions before.

August 2020

Your recent editing history at Soviet war crimes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Pudeo (talk) 16:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

possible vandalism at Soviet war crimes

your editions at soviet war crimes doesnt look constructive, being more similar to vandalism, so i ask you to stop, as vandalism can get you blocked from editing. PastaEditor2 (talk) 16:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jack90s15 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack90s15. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]