Jump to content

User talk:I like too read

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, I like too read! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Goose(Talk!) 20:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Thank you! I will look this over.I like too read (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Vineet Joshi: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. NJD-DE (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip, I will use it the next time.I like too read (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another tip: You might find a tool, such as Twinkle helpful. Makes it lot easier to add a note or warning message to a user's talk page, and also ensures that your message includes the related article and your signature. NJD-DE (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
...after having a look at WP:CVUA please. I'm currently concerned about the quality of the reverts; semi-automating them is not the first step here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: You are right about that ! Only noticed the reverts with missing warnings, didn't look at the quality of the reverts themselves.. NJD-DE (talk) 21:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No worries; most of them are fine, and Twinkle can indeed be helpful. I was just a bit hesitant about offering a big red "vandal" button yet. 😄 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ROLLBACKUSE

[edit]

Hi I like too read,

Special:Diff/977761595 was not vandalism. When undoing edits that are not vandalism (i.e. intentionally harmful), even if they're very disruptive, please provide an explanation for the revert in your edit summary. Thanks!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jack90s15 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack90s15. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I like too read (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I looked at the evidence saying I was a sockpuppet following the link. When looking at the editor interaction analyzer I made minor contributions to those pages, not major ones like the sock puppet.https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=Jack90s15&users=I+like+too+read My contributions for the almost 30 days have been undoing unconstructive editing and vandalism none of my contributions have been major to any World War II articles like the sock puppet has. Is there anyway I can prove I am not a sockpuppet so I can continue undoing unconstructive editing and vandalism? I would not edit any World War II related articles for any given time just to prove I am not of sock puppet of the banned user.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed via technical evidence and is not in doubt. This will count against any future unblock request from your original account, which is now banned under WP:3X. Yamla (talk) 23:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:I_like_too_read&oldid=982238209"