User talk:I am not Alexander Hamilton.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, I am not Alexander Hamilton., and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vicarianism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vicarianism
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vicarianism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Kidsgrove, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 18:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of religions and spiritual traditions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Clean Copytalk 10:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
If whoever wrote this can read this, it wasn't vandalism. It was adding a religion. I have now deemed Wikipedia a site of offensive people who hate anything new.
It wasn't vandalism. For some reason, Wikipedia despises my religion. I am not Alexander Hamilton. (talk) 08:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mignon Clyburn has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mignon Clyburn was changed by I am not Alexander Hamilton. (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953188 on 2017-12-14T18:31:30+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mignon Clyburn. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mignon Clyburn was changed by I am not Alexander Hamilton. (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858187 on 2017-12-16T09:31:40+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)