User talk:I Loves WASP

September 2017

Can you explain why you have again added "White Celtic and Germanic Protestant" to the lead of the article White Anglo-Saxon Protestant? The term is not otherwise contained in the article, it is not clear that it is relevant, and you have not provided a source to support it. Wikipedia policy is that when content of any article is disputed or removed, the burden of proof lies on the person wishing to restore that content, and such removed content should not be restored without providing reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of the content. It is commonly accepted that when one's edit has been reverted, if one still thinks it is an improvement then one should explain why and try to reach agreement, rather than just repeating the edit without explanation. I should therefore very much like to read your explanation of why you think your change improves readers' understanding of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:I_Loves_WASP reported by User:Chris troutman (Result: ). Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. The words "Anglo-Saxon" do not refer to other Germanic peoples. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]