User talk:I Attempt From Loves Sickness

Welcome...

Hello, I Attempt From Loves Sickness, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Also please note:
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to UK Independence Party, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.

Again, welcome! Ashanda (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hello again! Thank you for including the URLs of the sources of your information! However, including them only in the edit summary is of no use to the readers of the article. Could you please cite your sources within the text of the article? Instructions for doing so may be found at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thanks! Ashanda (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Simple Bob^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 21:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UKIP

Is that right? You don't want me to change other editors' work? What do you think Wikipedia is? Changing other editors' work is called......editing. The list is ridiculous as it stands (even apart from the fact that it nowhere mentions exctly what is meant by Patrons and Supporters) and can be dealt with (if it's needed, which I doubt, but I didn't remove it) in a simple sentence format. Which is what I did. And there is absolutely no need to list everybody's titles, honorifics and postnomials - that is done in each individual's own article. Nor should there be repeated links to the same topic. However, I notice that none of your work is referenced, so I will mark it up as such. But first, to show willing, I will approve you latest edit to this list. Emeraude (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Next time when you try and reference within the article, try and use a citation template such as {{cite web}}. Go look at the article and the template I linked, there are plenty of good references which you can use as a guide when referencing articles. If you need help, let me know. — Moe ε 21:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Simple Bob^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 10:21, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Marquis de la Eirron (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Attempt From Loves Sickness (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This isn't fair i'm not a sockpuppet, so why am I being blocked as just because i'm interested in certain things does not make me a sockpuppet and I haven't done anything disruptive or vandalised any pages. Its a free encyclopedia so why am I not being allowed to edit?? As just because I edit certain articles does not mean i'm a sockpuppet!!...Also the only person who has complained about me and has said that I am a sockpuppet is Simple Bob, so why should I be removed just because he doesn't like the way I edit!! Also if someones IP is blocked then they are unable to edit or create a new account, so if I was a sockpuppet how would have I been to do that as i'm not going to say move house and get a new IP just to edit wikipedia! Furthermore if this was real life and not on wikipedia the fact that you are calling me a liar by blocking me and then slandering me by saying i'm a sockpuppet would be classified as a potential libelous act and whilst normally incidents like this could result in a court hearing, on wikipedia I have no way of fighting back because as far as certain editors are concerned I am already guilty without evidence, though of course i'm not saying i'm going to sue as thats just really sad and pathetic, all i'm saying is that I dont' think its fair that i'm being called a liar and a sockpuppet when there is no evidence whatsoever to these allegations!!.I Attempt From Loves Sickness (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Have you read WP:LEGAL? It would be a violation of the rules for me to unblock you based on this request. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Attempt From Loves Sickness (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oh gosh, I wasn't saying I was going to sue, on the contrary I was using that as an example, as if someone who you didn't know was going around and saying things about you that you knew to be false e.g Jemima Khan having a super-injunction with Jeremy Clarkson, then these accusations could be perseved as potentially libelous as its smearing, So I was merely pointing out that you wouldn't do it in everyday society, so why is it acceptable to do it whilst online as just because your able to hide yourself behind your wikipedia name as no-one knows who you are, that doesn't give you the right to have a go at another editor and say they are a suspected sockpuppet on unfounded evidence. So as with my request before which was unfortunatly misunderstood, I ask you please may I be unblocked as I haven't done anything wrong and I am certainly not a sockpuppet! I Attempt From Loves Sickness (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per comment below. I will add, in response to your arguments, that Wikipedia is a privately run website and we are free to bar people from it as we please. In this case, it is our opinion that you have repeatedly violated our policies against using other accounts and claiming they are different people. So you're out. It's no different from refusing to let people into your residence if you don't like them. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are a persistent and disruptive sockpuppet who has no place on Wikipedia. In December you were told to stay away from here for six months, yet you keep coming back as an IP editor, or by registering new accounts. I can't see any sensible Wikiepdia admin ublocking you. --Simple Bob^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 13:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]