User talk:IEEE1394

9-1-2

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as 9-1-2) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nashville Monkey 09:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil comments

Your comments on Talk:9-1-2 are a violation of Wikipedia's civility policy; we do not permit users to conduct themselves in this manner. You are welcome to contribute if you can do so in line with our policies; if you cannot, you will be subject to corrective action, including blocking and dispute resolution. You are strongly encouraged to familiarize yourself with the relevant policies and contribute according to them. Essjay (Talk) 09:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule

You are in serious violation of the above rule here on Wikipedia. As you are new, I am assuming good faith and trusting that you do not know about this. You do now however so would be advised to stop before a block is possibly issued. Nashville Monkey 09:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You placed the {{Hangon}} tag on 9-1-2 yet have not given a reason

Per the instructions on the Delete tag: "If you created the page and you disagree with the page’s proposed speedy deletion, please add:

to the top of the page, and then explain why you believe the article should not be deleted on its talk page." (emphasis mine) Nashville Monkey 10:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Click here

Honestly, I am not picking on you and neither are any of the other editors here, we are simply tring to head you in the proper direction of editing. Nashville Monkey 10:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:912.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:912.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville Monkey is a fascist.

hey bro

you are keepin' it real the wikicrats are shit

there should be more people like you on here

peace out Ę

April 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:119.47.120.180. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 03:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Do What You Do (Mudvayne song). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 03:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 9-1-2

A tag has been placed on 9-1-2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 9-1-3

A tag has been placed on 9-1-3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 9-1-4

A tag has been placed on 9-1-4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Do What You Do (Mudvayne song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ttonyb (talk) 04:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please consider refactoring your comments on your userpage. Thanks. 7 04:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Urge NZ Bear 2010

A tag has been placed on Mr. Urge NZ Bear 2010 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 04:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freenet (ISP)

The article Freenet (ISP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]