User talk:IAskWhatIsTrue

December 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IAskWhatIsTrue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia:No personal attacks, wikipedias own ideas about what is a "personal attack" Does not pointing out a dishonesty a "personal attack". Acroterion says I "attacked the editor who declieed my draft", no I didn't, He thinks me saying he is "dishonest" on the commons here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#User:IAskWhatIsTrue_Personal_attacks

Is a "personal attack"

I did not mention race once. I explained how user Elias was the disruptive editor, not me, I seek to finish my draft in peace, Elias initaited the disruptive editing and even TimTrent admitted to this when he reviewed the draft that I did not submit, elias submitted, I did not want it submitted yet, so I had no intentions of attack timtrent in the first place cause I didn't expect the article to get published as I didn't submit it - elias did for reasons I explained in the email and on here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Draft:Arabid_Slavery

I documented that I sent an email out during the time I had been banned - but I have NOT mentioned race since the time I was banned - and anyone who wants to read the email can do so.

I encourage someone higher up that Acroterion to understand that something VERY WRONG is happening - I am trying to draft a truthful article - that article was attempted to be sabotaged by elias as mentieond on the conflict of interest page - I please encourage someone higher up to email me or send me contact as if I email them it will become clear the wrong person is being banned - and the rationale clear and honest about the real conflict of interest was explained in an email sent to Acroterion - who doesn't understand the issue at hand clearly demonstrated by the message sent 23:51 11 December 2022 - cause I ddin't submit the article in the first place - the conflict of interst editor did - and yet Acroterion seems to believe I am out to get the edtior who declined my draft when I hadn't even finished teh draft- someone else did - I had no expectations of it being accepted when I hadn't finished it.

So I enocurage someone higher up to see my EMAIL. ANd I'll clearly explain what's happened. BECAUSE THIS IS WRONG. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you seem to think that what you did was okay, I am declining your request. Furthermore, since you are polluting this page with walls of text, I am removing your access to this page. You may use WP:UTRS for further appeals, or if you want to go higher up, contact ArbCom. 331dot (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.