User talk:IAmTheWalrus89460
Military use of children
[edit]My apologies for reverting your edit. It was an accident. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Washo language
[edit]You are violating WP:BRD. If you make a change and are reverted, then you must produce evidence from reliable sources and build a consensus for your change. If you had actually read the discussion at Talk:Washo language, you would see that there is no evidence for the changes you propose. Indeed, you don't seem to actually know that the tribe has no official orthography and uses the system found in multiple scholarly sources and summarized at [1]. --Taivo (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- That's funny. You obviously have no idea of what you're talking about. IAmTheWalrus (talk) 05:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- You still have no evidence, no reliable sources, no apparent understanding of Wikipedia policies and procedures, and I seriously doubt you have any understanding of linguistics. So unless you have any actual evidence for your edits that overrides the multiple sources which I have cited and linked to, then this discussion is over. --Taivo (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- I know my language. That's more than can be said for you. IAmTheWalrus (talk) 05:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter to Wikipedia one bit. Unless you have actual reliable sources, your opinion doesn't count any more than my opinion of whether or not you actually know Washo or are just a learner. --Taivo (talk) 05:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, if you'd rather keep things incorrect, so be it. IAmTheWalrus (talk) 05:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter to Wikipedia one bit. Unless you have actual reliable sources, your opinion doesn't count any more than my opinion of whether or not you actually know Washo or are just a learner. --Taivo (talk) 05:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- I know my language. That's more than can be said for you. IAmTheWalrus (talk) 05:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- You still have no evidence, no reliable sources, no apparent understanding of Wikipedia policies and procedures, and I seriously doubt you have any understanding of linguistics. So unless you have any actual evidence for your edits that overrides the multiple sources which I have cited and linked to, then this discussion is over. --Taivo (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)