User talk:IAmCoolForever2023

IAmCoolForever2023, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi IAmCoolForever2023! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 17:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please use the proper method to submit an article for AfD instead. ⁓ Hello 71 22:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Gormiti episodes

The article List of Gormiti episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

completely unsourced. Everything after season 1 appears to be speculation. Unnecessary split from the main article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 23:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Neutralhomer. I noticed that you recently made an edit to List of United States cable and satellite television networks that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 23:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved PBJ (TV network) back to its rightful place. It's a network, not a channel. Now, please stop moving things around without having discussed this on a talk page first; such undiscussed moves are highly bothersome. Drmies (talk) 00:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network--which you moved to a title that was so obviously wrong that I'm wondering how you came up with it. If you continue such moves--wrong and without discussion--you will be blocked. Drmies (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop renaming articles to incorrect titles or adding information to articles with incorrect information, as you have done here. If this continues, you will be blocked. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gormiti (TV series)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gormiti (TV series), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 03:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Gormiti episodes

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as List of Gormiti episodes, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 03:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Gormiti episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Gormiti episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gormiti episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 06:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gormiti (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gormiti (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gormiti (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 06:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes

Please stop removing Looney Tunes from its section on the "List of Programs Broadcast by Cartoon Network" site. It still airs, check thier website. Ctesjbuvf (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I've already told you once. Do NOT remove Looney Tunes from there. Look at this. You'll notice that it's on all days at 6AM and weekdays at 12PM, so it's still there. Ctesjbuvf (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Planet

Can you provide a source that says Cartoon Network has stopped showing Cartoon Planet? Trivialist (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't

Don't make threats on actions you can not perform [1] and also if you were an administrator you would know that type of behavior and action in that instance would not be tolerated by the community. Do not use hidden markup to further a dispute with threats Calmer Waters 19:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you vandalize this page one more time, you will be blocked. Stop NOW! Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 07:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent disruptive editing. This has included, amongst other things: repeatedly removing content apparently because you personally don't like it; behaving as though you own articles, and so can tell other editors what they may and may not do; and making threats. See, for example, this edit. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Verizon FiOS channels, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You were warned about this before. Stop now. Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 20:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for not addressing the concerns for your previous block and continuing with persistent disruptive editing. This has included, amongst other things: repeatedly removing content apparently because you personally don't like it; making unnecessary page moves, behaving as though you own articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Sky Angel channels, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IO Digital Cable Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nat Geo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IO Digital Cable Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SonLife Broadcasting Network

Hello IAmCoolForever2023,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SonLife Broadcasting Network for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, @SmithAndTeam (talk) 01:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please stop your disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing of tagging articles for speedy deletion then leaving blank messages on the talk page contesting the speedy deletion. Continued disruption of that sort WILL lead you to being blocked again. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, you cannot tag an article with an AFD tag (as you did with Qwest Choice TV Omaha) without actually adding them to the existing group AFD or nominating them separately. All three of the articles I caught this morning have had their AFD tags removed, because they were not discussed or mentioned at the AFD you linked. See also WP:AFDHOWTO for more information, or ask me for help. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi IAmCoolForever2023. You have already been blocked twice. I'm sure that you believe your edits are in the best interest of the encyclopedia, but they continue to be disruptive. You really need to acknowledge the blocks and many warnings now because it would be a pity if you have to be told to stop editing indefinitely. There are many things you still don't understand about the way we work on Wikipedia, so you may wish to check out the excellent training programme we have at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user, and if you have any questions or would like any advice, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hispanic Christian Community Network

Hello IAmCoolForever2023,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hispanic Christian Community Network for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Merlin^s orca 04:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of DirecTV channels (United States)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of DirecTV channels (United States), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thebestofall007 (talk) 04:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, refusal to communicate is a secondary reason for the block. Any request for unblocking should address that issue as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]