User talk:IAMSTILLREALKING

September 2023

Hello, I'm Siroxo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Marc O'Polo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —siro χ o 09:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marc O'Polo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Marc O'Polo was changed by IAMSTILLREALKING (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898175 on 2023-09-06T02:20:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Truett dingle

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Truett dingle, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CoconutOctopus talk 07:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Truett dingle (February 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

CoconutOctopus talk 07:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IAMSTILLREALKING! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 07:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]