User talk:I7p0h8o0n9e0
I7p0h8o0n9e0, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi I7p0h8o0n9e0! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC) |
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, I7p0h8o0n9e0. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]- You appear to have made 5 reverts in about an 8 hour period which constitutes sanctionable edit warring. I see you are a new editor so you may not realize you have placed yourself in position to be blocked from editing. When you make changes to an article and since you are being asked to get consensus to those changes you must take your changes to the talk page and get agreement from editors involved to make those changes. Deal with the edits slowly so other editors can follow your requests. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and when asked to get consensus before changes especially from established editors please consider their experience and do so. I am adding the Wikipedia template indicating you are involved in an edit war. Littleolive oil (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Isabel Oakeshott shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.