Jump to content

User talk:I64s/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Terence/N

This is an archive of my talk page. Please do NOT post any new messages here. Instead, post it at my main talk page. Thanks.

Re : WP:ER!

[edit]

Glad to hear that you're getting better. I afraid not for the time being actually, time constrains and the killer workload I've to handle in real life means that I have to keep it as it is for the time being. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 17:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Terence!

[edit]
Thank you!
Hello, I64s/Archive 6 — The greatest Thank you for your support on my recent Nomination for Adminship. It succeeded with a final tally of 85/11/6 and I am now an administrator. Be sure to let me know how I can assist you. Bastiqueparlervoir 18:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

[edit]
Thanks
Thanks
I64s/Archive 6, thank you you so much for validating my RfA! I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have taken both the positive and constructive on board. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please let me know, ditto if you see me stumble! Thanks again for your much appreciated support. Deizio talk 18:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1942 mod

[edit]

Stargate: Battle for Mankind is up for AFD again. List of Battlefield 1942 mods AFD may also be of interest. Bfelite 02:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get well soon

[edit]

Hi Terence. I saw that you have been unwell recently. Rest up, and get well soon. Regards, and I have done a review. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheng San GRC

[edit]

I had already edit the Cheng San GRC article, please feel free to look at it. -- Littlearea 13:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sukh's RFA - Thanks!

[edit]

Thank you for your vote on my RfA. Unfortunately there was no consensus reached at 43 support, 18 oppose and 8 neutral. I've just found out that there is a feature in "my preferences" that forces me to use edit summaries. I've now got it enabled :) Thanks again. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 15:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Happy birthday!

[edit]

Thanks for the well-wishes, that was greatly appreciated! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 18:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heytesbury street

[edit]

Hi, This certainly was a candidate for deletion in its original form. I've now added material and wonder if you could see what you think of it now? Dlyons493 Talk 20:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

[edit]
Thank you, Terence Ong, for voting in my RFA. It closed with a final result of 75/1/0. Now that I am an administrator here, I will continue to improve this encyclopedia, using my new tools to revert vandalism, block persistent vandals, protect pages that have been vandalized intensively, and close AFD discussions. Any questions? Please contact me by adding a new section on my talk page. Again, thanks to all of you who participated!!! -- King of 23:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you

[edit]
The count is in, and now I join the crew who wield the mops and pails.
Thanks for your support! I pledge to serve both you and Jimbo Wales.

If you have anything you need, then please don't think to hesitate.

For I am the very model of a grateful admin designate!
Bucketsofg

RE:Off-Wiki Chat, Meetup

[edit]

Hello! I hope you are feeling great! Regarding your question, no, I do not use IM. Anyway, I would like to thank you for informing me about the meetup. I might just be going for it but I am unable to give you a definite answer yet. Thanks! --Siva1979Talk to me 13:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help on Mathematics

[edit]
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mathematics was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau 21:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Merci beaucoup!

[edit]
Thank you, I64s/Archive 6!
Thank you for voting for my recent RfA, which passed (to my extreme surprise and shock) with a total tally of 66/15/2. For that, I would like to thank you and offer a helping hand in any admin-related tasks that may be required -- it's as simple as leaving a message on my talkpage. Thanks again! -→Buchanan-Hermit/!? 22:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Hi Terence! Thank you very much for your support of my request for adminship. I especially appreciated the support from fellow Esperanzans, as I know they have the highest standards for civility. Thanks again, and feel free to leave me a message if you ever see something I could be doing better. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Terence Ong! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Fetofs Hello! 12:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TFD

[edit]

I'm curious about your voting at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_24#Template:HalJordan. You voted to subst and delete {{applecomputer}}, yet you vote to keep {{KyleRayner}}, which has the exact same rationale for deletion, without giving an explanation. What's your rationale? Night Gyr 16:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about this and still haven't seen a response from you. Night Gyr 15:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to an MFD nomination

[edit]

On Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Bambenek you suggested that the nomination had been a case of WP:POINT. The nominator took that quite badly. You may have been right, but I think you'd have been better off stating your case without the accusation. Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Happy editing! --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to say that the anon shouldn't take it too personally. Yes, I do assume good faith, but I do have to point out that the other editor who voted keep also mentioned that the anon IP is making a point. What I write there is not to be taken personally. However, I am feeling that I'm going too far at times. --Terence Ong 09:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, the anon should assume your good faith too. You and stillnotelft may well have been right, but you didn't need to say so, you could have made the same point and simply missed out the accusation. That's what the WP:AGF policy means. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Canon

[edit]

I will be grateful if you will let me know what Roman Canon treats of other than what Text and rubrics of the Roman Canon is about. That will change my mind about considering it duplication. Of course, I do not refer to its few words on the History of the Roman Canon, which is dealt with in immeasurably greater depth in the article of the same name. Lima 14:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Bowlby article

[edit]

Thank you for attempting to improve the version of the John Bowlby article with the addition of links (popups).

I don't know if you've yet noticed, but it was reverted within 5 minutes!

I've tried to compare to see what you added, but the oddities of the diff function made that difficult. You might look at my version, and let me know if I missed anything that you had added. (This being my "morning revert", I also made some other improvements, as is my wont.)

BTW, how do you identify revisions by number? I'm so callow at Wikipedia editing that I have yet to learn such arcana.

Larry Sarner 16:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I discovered how you identified the revisions. (All I had to do was look!) Thanks, anyway. Sarner

My RFA

[edit]
Thank you for your recent vote on my RFA, regardless of how you voted. I appreciate all votes. I am going to wait until I have more edits in all namespaces. (And also improve answering impossible questions ;). Hopefully one day I will be more sucessful than it was looking, once I meet most user's voting standards. Again, thanks for your time! ~Linuxerist E/L/T 02:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bah!-- 贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC!

Tone's RfA thanks

[edit]
Dear I64s/Archive 6 — Thank you for your support on my recent RfA. It succeeded with a final tally of 46/2/3 so now I am an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the new tools, but please let me know if there's any anything I can help you with in the future. And please correct me, if you spot I make a mistake. Thank you again. --Tone 23:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you recently reverted Australia. But why did you revert it to Version 54, which was a very, very long time ago? Most of the article were lost through that revision. G.He 04:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, it was an accident. My IRC client is a bit weird. --Terence Ong 04:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No harm done. I reverted it back to the previous version by Jose77. G.He 04:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an inappropriate use of Wikipedia? Seems like the only thing that person is doing is using her userpage as a blog/myspace/attack page mishmash thing. Only contribs are for the userpage as well as some test thing on pufferfish. And assuming it were an inappropriate use, what would be the consequences?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talkcontribs) .

Userpage revert

[edit]

Glad to help. :) Cheers, Sango123 (e) 04:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:MRT image

[edit]

Images on Commons don't need to be uploaded on Wikipedia? Then, what about the Now Commons tag? Is the tag redundant? Does this mean that I absolutely CANNOT upload images from Commons to Wikipedia? Does this mean that I can transfer the images on Commons to Wikipedia directly without downloading it first on my PC? Am I making a mistake here regarding the usage of images on Commons and on Wikipedia? By the way, I am not uploading my own images. I just downloaded them from Commons to my PC and transferred them to Wikipedia. Am I violating any official policy of Wikipedia by doing this? I hope that you can help me out in this area of Wikipedia as I have currently little experience in dealing with Image issues. Anyway, thank you for your feedback on this matter. --Siva1979Talk to me 04:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Allow me to reply, Terence? :) Normally there is no need to transfer images from Commons to Wikipedia. The very idea behind Commons is to have a common store of images that are immediately usable in all Wikimedia wikis (such as Chinese Wikipedia, Malay Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikinews, ...) once they are uploaded onto Commons. Hence Wikipedia will immediately "see" an image when you upload it to Commons without any extra steps. Images on Wikipedia that are duplicates of Commons images are tagged so that they can be removed - no need to waste valuable disk space on 2 copies of the same file.
That said, an image uploaded to Wikipedia is not the same as an image uploaded to Commons. Internally their file storage areas are separate - for example, Wikipedia stores fair use images that are not permitted on Commons. In special cases duplication of a Commons image might be needed, but for normal users like us, we'll never have to duplicate a Commons image on Wikipedia. If you spot a duplicate, tag it for the sysops to remove the Wikipedia copy. Kimchi.sg 16:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I wish to thank you for making this clear to me! --Siva1979Talk to me 19:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concordia newsletter

[edit]

Concordia Newsletter

Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.

Concordia is an organization of editors on Wikipedia that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.

We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.

If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.

Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Wikipedia:Concordia/Do Not Spam.

Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel [1].

- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Re : Welcome back :)

[edit]

Thank you. Yes, hard to resist, thanks to my Wikipediholicism! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 16:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments in Lar's RfA!

[edit]
We are here to build an encyclopedia!

Hi Terence, and thank you for your positve comments in my request for adminship! With a final tally of (109/5/1), I have been entrusted with adminship. It's been several weeks since the conclusion of the process, so hopefully you've had a chance to see me in action. Please let me know what you think! Thanks again, and let me buy you a beer if I'm ever in S'pore again! ++Lar: t/c 03:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adverts: Like The Beatles?... Like LEGO?... In a WikiProject that classifies?... Are you an accountable admin?... Got DYK?...

RfA

[edit]

Hey Terence! I realized that you are not an admin and I was thinking of nominating you. Are you interested? --Tone 21:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that you were nominated before but you withdrew and said that the next candidacy would occur the earliest at the end of May. What a coincidence. Well, should you accept, you have my support. --Tone 21:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
File:Atlanticpuffin4.jpg Hello Terence. Thank you for your support at request for adminship and your gracious statement in my Editor review, which was also highly influential, as it was quoted by many RfA participants and strongly contributed to the overwhelming and flattering result of (160/1/0), and leaves me in a position of having to live up to a high standard of community expectation. If you need any admin help with anything, feel free to ask me - and of course, if I make any procedural mistakes, feel free to point them out. Of course, I look forward to working with you in the future, as well as your impending RfA, of course. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Request about India Basher

[edit]

I request you to reconsider your views on India Basher. The article has been developed further and has more information.

In any case, may I request you to share your views on the revised article?--Cardreader 00:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin coaching

[edit]

Mine start June 12th, and I'm kinda busy this week. Next week (June 5) should be okay for me, is it OK with you? NSLE (T+C) at 00:21 UTC (2006-05-30)

MfD on Wikipedia:Anti Vandalism Unit

[edit]

Hi,

I have reverted the premature deletion closure on this, specifically so that the community might consider Rossami's in-debate proposal of merge and redirect. I hope you don't mind, but I suppose it is better to consider Rossami's idea now. Best wishes, Xoloz 16:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking Editor Review Commentary (If You Like)

[edit]

Hi. In conjunction with my RfA (that you voted on), I have created an editor review, to give people a chance to comment as to ways in which I can branch out or alter my contributions to Wikipedia. An RfA seems to solely focus on how one's temperment and contributions relate to how they might handle administrative powers (and the consensus on that seems to be that I'm not quite ready); the editor review opens things up a little more to a larger focus, and I'd love to hear community feedback in the sense of that larger focus, too. If you feel you've already expressed yourself sufficiently when casting your vote, then by all means don't worry about it, but if any thoughts come to mind or if you'd like to expound upon any suggestions or commentary, it would be appreciated. In any case, I appreciated you taking the time to express your opinion on my RfA, and I thank you for that. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 19:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Barnstar :)

[edit]

Hello. Thank you for the barnstar! I really appreciate that. Hope I live up to it!

Advanced 08:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC) (Happy Holidays!)[reply]

TFD of Kerala user templates

[edit]

Hello Terence. Please see Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_31#Template:User_Kerala_and_Template:User_KERALA_wiki where you had voted, where the nomination has been changed, and reconsider your vote.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 08:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the revert

[edit]

Cheers,  :) Dlohcierekim 14:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help.

[edit]

Hey...

I am one of the people who run the Darkonin, a kingdom in the online Mud Dark and Shattered Lands. Some people are trying to get it deleted due to lack of "notablility." I got your name off the World of Warcraft history, if you would post on the talk page about how it is sort of notable, as if that isn't notable, neither is anything about World of Warcraft, or many a fantastical novel.

Thanks.

My RfA

[edit]
Thanks
Thanks
I64s/Archive 6, thank you for participating in my RfA. Unfortunately, a great number of oppose voters felt that I lacked experience, and a consensus was not reached (the final tally was 30/28/10). Perhaps I will try again in another few months when I have a few more edits under my belt. If I do, I hope I can count on your support. Thanks again! Cool3 talk 20:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

A haiku of thanks

[edit]
Thanks for your support
In my RfA, which passed!
Wise I'll try to be.

You managed to get the first RfA cliche! Thanks so much for your positive support.

-- Natalya 03:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

[edit]

Thank you for the trust that you had in me when you supported my Request for Adminship. The nomination ended successfully and I am actually overwhelmed by the support that I received. Thanks again! -- Kim van der Linde at venus 06:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship?

[edit]

I feel that it is time for you to play a bigger role in Wikipedia. You have over 10,000 edits and that is impressive. Moreover, you have been here for nearly one year. On a personal note, it pains me to view you as a normal user despite all these edits. Would you consider running for adminship? I am ready to nominate you if you give me the green light. I strongly and sincerely believe that if you are given the extra tools, Wikipedia would be much, much better off. --Siva1979Talk to me 02:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be willing to co-nominate. NSLE (T+C) at 02:31 UTC (2006-06-04)

If Siva nominates first, I'll post a conom; otherwise I'll nominate on June 7 (Wednesday). NSLE (T+C) at 11:13 UTC (2006-06-05)

My Thanks

[edit]

I wanted to drop a brief note on your talk page (one admittedly not written to you only, but nevertheless truly meant) to thank you for your vote in my Request for Adminship, which concluded this evening. Even though it was unsuccessful, it did make clear to me some areas in which I can improve my contributions to Wikipedia, both in terms of the areas in which I can participate and the manner in which I can participate. I do plan on, at some point in the future (although, I think, not the near future), attempting the process again, and I hope you will consider participating in that voting process as well. If you wish in the future to offer any constructive criticism to me, or if I may assist you with anything, I hope you will not hesitate to contact me. Thanks again. — WCityMike (T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  04:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]
--Bhadani 07:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Welcome back!!

[edit]

Thanks for the welcome back. It is hard to leave after a while, but for me it's been more than 6 months. Actually, I'm coming up on 1 year, although my first recorded edit on an IP was in January 2005. Boy, I gotta find somthing better to do with my time. ;-) Cheers, and thanks again! The King of Kings 00:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==A very sad thank you==
Thank you for your vote in my recent RFA. At 43/43/14, I decided it was best to withdraw. I will wait until another time for an RFA. Thanks again, ILovePlankton 03:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote

[edit]

You have voted twice on my RFA, #6 and #63. Please strike out one of them. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 03:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on List of Finns

[edit]

This happens occasionally, someone adds something, but, for whatever reason, part of the text is cut out at an unusual position. [2] I just wanted to remind you to give a slight glance at actions like accidental blanking like this and not to remove what the user really wanted to edit with a simple revert/rollback. It happens to others other than that anon user, like the user Quadratic which I helped him out with twice. Kevin_b_er 04:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 5th.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 23 5 June 2006

About the Signpost


New revision-hiding feature added Paper profiles Wales, slams Wikipedia business coverage
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages New external tools
News and Notes: Wikimedia board resolutions, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report On Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

My RfA

[edit]

Thank you for supporting me in my recently unsuccessful RfA. I plan on working harder in the coming months so that I have a better chance of becoming an admin in the future. I hope that you will consider supporting me if I have another RfA. Thank you for your support. --digital_me(t/c) 15:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

[edit]
Thanks
Thanks
I64s/Archive 6, thank you for participating in my RfA. It passed with an amazingly unopposed 77/0/1. Thanks for the support everybody! If you see me doing anything wrong, want to ask me something, or just want to yell in my general direction, leave me a note on my talk page. I promise to try and knock out Wikipedia's problems wherever I may find them!

Staxringold talkcontribs 20:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evil!

[edit]

Hey there

[edit]

Thanks for commenting on my RfA...it was greatly appreciated! --Osbus 21:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What up with the revert?

[edit]

2006 Toronto terrorism case Care to explain???--CltFn 04:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , no problem --CltFn 04:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

[edit]
Template usage notes
  • Please refer to the index of test templates before using any template on user talk pages to warn a user. Applying the best template available for your purpose may help reduce confusion from the message you are sending.
  • Please remember to substitute the template using {{subst:I64s/Archive 6}} instead of {{I64s/Archive 6}}.
Please remember to add one of these templates to a user's talk page when correcting vandalism. Thanks. -- Masterpjz9 04:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : IRC

[edit]

Will do. Remind me again if I forget by tomorrow. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 11:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

[edit]

I know I don't have e-mail working right now. For some reason it won't except my e-mail at all no matter how many time I confirm it. :-( Oh well, I know it might be risky, but I'll tell you anyways:

moe_epsilon@yahoo.com

Now lets just hope a vandal doesn't feel like giving me mail ;-) The King of Kings 07:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you decide to send me mail, I might not read it until tomorrow. Its 3:30 a.m. where I am and I haven't slept in 48 hours, so yeah.. The King of Kings 07:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]
Thank you for supporting my Request for Adminship! I appreciate it and will do my best to maintain the faith you have shown in me! – Ben W Bell talk 07:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Rfa

[edit]

Thank you for your comments, Terence! And as for your RfA, do not be discouraged if it ends up as a failure again. Take note of the opposing comments seriously (these comments are actually the most helpful ones in making you into a much better editor) and continue to provide quality contributions to Wikipedia. Do not be too discouraged by the negative remarks and always remember that you will always have my support. One day, you will be an admin, so just keep on trying to the best of your abilities. --Siva1979Talk to me 04:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's hoping this one goes through... -- Samir धर्म 04:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly smile

[edit]
<! -- Template:smile2 --> --Bhadani 13:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

[edit]
Hello, I64s/Archive 6, and thank you for voting on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini 05:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID

[edit]
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Recycling was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Thank you - U.S. FAC

[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for supporting the recent FAC of United States, but unfortunately it failed to pass. However, I hope you will vote again in the future. In the mean time, please accept this Mooncake as a token of my gratitude.--Ryz05 t 15:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my RfA. Sorry to see yours not doing so well... I think you deserve it – Gurch 16:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 12th.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 24 12 June 2006

About the Signpost


From the editor: RSS returns
English Wikipedia reaches 1,000 Featured Articles Administrator desysopped after sockpuppeting incident
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages News and Notes: Wikimedia board resolutions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report On Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 01:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motherussia.jpg Hello Terence Ong, and thank you for your support at my request for adminship, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. For Mother Russia!!
And don't be sad about your own RfA. There are so many things you can do here without being an admin! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

[edit]
Terence Ong, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. --Fir0002 08:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

[edit]

I am sorry to inform you that your Request for Adminship (RfA) has failed to reach sufficient consensus for promotion, and has now been delisted and archived. Please do not look upon this outcome as a discouragement, but rather as an opportunity to improve. Try to address the concerns raised during your RfA and, in a few months' time, resubmit your request. Thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity! Redux 13:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shame. Give it time, my friend. Just zis Guy you know? 14:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bad luck. Leave it a couple of months. You never know, the community might come round! Just remember that you are an excellent and respected editor around here. See you around. haz (user talk) 15:17, 13 June 2006

Will you still be joining us on the 23rd in light of your Wikibreak? Kimchi.sg 15:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up your good work and I will still support you.--Jusjih 17:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a shame your nomination failed, but you're quite welcome anyways. Better luck next time! --Merovingian {T C @} 19:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't expect it should be too much longer. Happy editing! RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will miss your photos while you're away. You may not make a good admin now in some people's eyes, but right now you're a good editor! :) Kimchi.sg 03:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was my pleasure to support your RFA and I'm sorry it didn't work out...this time. You'll be back and eventually succeed. Cheers. PJM 03:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry it did not pass, but don't worry! I will support you next time, as I did this time. It will be better next time around.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 10:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

[edit]

You're most definately welcome! But eventually, you'll get the mop, so don't be down! You're much deserving of it! Эйрон Кинни (t) 05:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

T-dot

[edit]

Terence man, I don't know what to say. I'm shocked and chagrined that your RfA didn't pass. You've done so much for Wikipedia man, and it's a real shame that things didn't go through. I hope you enjoy your wikibreak (time off is always a good thing), watch the World Cup, chill for a bit, but then come back better than ever!! And adminship will happen for you... Trust me. In the interim, just leave me a message or e-mail me if there's anything you need from an admin standpoint. And take care man. Would be a shame if a bright light like you got dimmed on Wikipedia -- Samir धर्म 08:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]