User talk:I'ma editor2022/Archives/2024/January

This is an archive of past discussions about User:I'ma editor2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Traditional chiefs of Palau has an RfC

Traditional chiefs of Palau has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 09:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brent C. Landau has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brent C. Landau. Thanks! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment, the list is probably superfluous anyways. Would it be more appropriate to just have a small list of the books he has authored/co-authored? — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 20:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent C. Landau (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent C. Landau and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 11:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'ma editor2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 11:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)