User talk:I'm Spartacus!/archive 11

admin coachee/admin coach

I'll do both, and I will be very very tough on my coachees, so pls do the same for me. ;-) But I'll tak care of the subpage etc. tomorrow. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 19:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

And another one, between you and me and the wall and everyone else who reads your talk page. Can you do your checkie thingie on Steve (talk · contribs)? That guy has really impressed me and should be an admin. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I've asked him if he is interested... I didn't see anything that triggered any alarms, but I didn't look that close. I spend too much time reviewing candidates to do a full review on somebody who isn't interested.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

He's responded on his talk page.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 07:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Me, too. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Tango and SQL bots - boy, you're keen. <grin> Oh, and <bong> you've got mail. --Dweller (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Coaching

Balloonman...

I've done some thinking, and I've come to the conclusion that maybe adminship isn't the right way to go for me yet. Although I feel confident as an editor, I don't think that I am ready to undo go an entire examination of my attitudes/thoughts/etc. Furthermore, I think that I'm just not quite the admin-type. I'm actually very much at ease with my position as it is. I might try in a year, but that is all.

My apologies if this has caused any disappointment, and by no means have I been let down by any of your constructive and helpful comments. :)

Regards,

La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 02:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem... if you ever change you mind let me know...---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 02:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Ironholds's RfA

You responded substantively and productively, and properly so, to my silly comment, one that was, I suppose, offered for my own amusement and not much else, so I feel compelled to note (and this is something you've probably realized but simply did not state explicitly because (a) I was being stupid and (b) I was being useless [I am often one or the other here, but even I struggle to pull of the double]) that I meant not to compare your oppose to one of Kurt's or to suggest that you were partaking of any of the putatively problematic behaviors partaken of by Kurt; I was simply playing on your typo of "kurt" for "curt", and I apologize for any confusion. (In the time that it took me to make my pointless comment, add a qualifier to the first, and then offer a second clarification, I might have done something more productive here, but I might also have added to my own verbally masturbatory !vote, causing heads to explode, so we'll mark this one of the plus side of the ledger.) Again, apologies. Cheers, Joe 07:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Quick question

I think I need to review what I've learned. I think I've pretty much got down the ban and block guidelines, as well as the deletion policy. Would it be possible for you to quiz me or something similar? Cheers. [Formerly LordSunday] —Ceran [speak] 11:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Er your talk page says that you aren't interested in being an admin and that you are retired?---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 00:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Not retired, just extremely 'tired. I'm swamped right now, and the anti-admin thing is um, my rebellious side. I don't really want to be an admin at the moment (or any time soon), but I would like to know what I need for adminship. It's a tad confusing, though. —Ceran ¿? 19:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Rfa counter tool

You mentioned on Ironhold's RFA that x and y people have 80% oppose rates or whatever. What was the link to that tool? I remember seeing it before and have completely forgot where it is. naerii 16:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

It's [1]. -- how do you turn this on 18:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

RFA voting stats

Hey,

I'm very interested in your stats for different people and they way they vote. You mentioned a few people on the talk of Ironhold's RFA, but it would be good if a page could be created that listed "interesting facts" (such as "who has opposed the most times?" "who has voted the most?" "who has gone neutral the most" etc). I tried using SQL's bot but it throttled me. -- how do you turn this on 18:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

That happened to me, as well. Seems the tool is down... –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The tool has been very annoying... it's working 50% of the time.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 22:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Ok then  HK22 ^{Talk to me!} 05:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

New username

Hey there, Balloonman. Long time no see. Well, it has only been about a 1.5 months. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that I've been renamed to RyanCross (talk · contribs), so I'm not RyRy (talk · contribs) anymore. Yours truly, – RyanCross (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that on Keeper's page a few days ago. Seems like everybody is getting a name change lately... LordSunday above also changed his name recently...---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Well then, you might find this interesting. – RyanCross (talk) 06:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes I did.... and it explained A LOT! BTW, I've thought about changing my name too... I just can't think of anything I'd rather have... the one's that I can think of are A) too personal, and I don't want wikipedia to know who I am in real life or B) Promotional (Eg won't be allowed due to various policies.)---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 06:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You have a userbox saying, "This user was a Professional Balloon Twister". I assume that's where you got "Balloonman" from? You also have "This User is a Black Belt in Kung Fu" and "This user is an Auditor userboxes. Maybe your username should be "BlackBeltMan" or "AuditorMan"? I like your current username though–most of the community knows you as "Balloonman" (the RfA man). Sorry for the long wait between replies. I'm a bit busy. – RyanCross (talk) 06:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I haven't done Kung Fu in a few years, so that wouldn't be a good name... audit... while I'm an auditor, it is a job, not a passion. I haven't done balloons in years either... but... who knows... I'll probably stay with Balloonman because there is nothing I like better.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 14:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC) EDIT: As for my name... yeah, when you twist balloons people come to you and say, 'Balloonman' all the time, but my stage name was "PoppaBalloon" (or Pop-a-Balloon) thus my talkpage linkname---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 17:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/JPG-GR

You !voted twice on this RfA. Once in the neutral section and later in the Support Section. Since the Support !vote came after the neutral, I indented the Neutral. If I got it wrong, and you want to be neutral (not support) please fix it.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that.

I had indented it (see here), but apparently someone changed it.

Thanks again : ) - jc37 08:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks :). Even if it didn't work, at least it's something we can rule out for the next time the perennial debate comes around. I'm not one for any kind of grudge, and I look forward to seeing you around-wiki in the future. Ironholds (talk) 14:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You deserved it... while the RfA failed, and I think the concept failed, you were the first person to bring a meaningful attempt at reform to the project in a long time. For that, you deserve credit.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 14:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

More Caspian

Now I'm a vandal... I dunno what his issue is. He doesn't seem to get the meaning of the word "stop". I can't see what possible benefit in templating me was, and reverting my perfectly acceptable edit. Ah well. Best wishes, -- how do you turn this on 22:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

yeah, if a crat hasn't removed it by the time I get home from work, I'll probably take him to ANI... I'll give a crat the chance first... don't want to appear to be forum shopping.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 22:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

As for your personal attacks

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You really think you're being logical? As for fallacy that you're referring to me as such, I don't see any logic from your non-apology apology. Who made the atmosphere of the ongoing RFA unnecessarily hostile with the personal attack? You falsely blame me that I made that, but did I? You, Tan and others' uncivil badgering are oppressing me to answer the. inquisition continuously. I stand by my stance which is so simple and is no harm. Clearly, there is no requirement for me to make satisfiable answer for supporters nor to persuade them. As I have repeatedly said, I don't get any logic from "per nom, "absolutely", "good editor", "deserves to become admin" which comprise much of suppoters' rationales. I don't have any problem with their logically missing rationale. Their answers are just "emotional supports". Why don't you just leave me alone? Why are you guys so harassing me to follow your likelihood? You and your friends implied that I opposed candidates with logically flawed rationales so that my RFA support rate is so low. I do not participate in every RFA. I only do for whomever I've met in the past or I take interests or whose support rate is hovering around 70% to 85%. You grouped me together with Kurt Weber as demonizing me. I don't endorse you to relocate my opinion to the talk page. My reasoning does not convince you because you're not me nor opposer.--Caspian blue (talk) 23:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Knock it off, Caspian. What possible benefit is there in continuing this? You're simply carrying on arguments for no reason. -- how do you turn this on 23:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You're the one to knock it off. Why are you so eager to remove my opinion from the page? --Caspian blue (talk) 23:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Your opinion has no place on the RFA (unless it's about the candidate). You said a bureaucrat could remove it; WJBscribe did, and you tell him he isn't neutral. I don't understand why you're doing this. -- how do you turn this on 23:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

It might've be much better if other 'crats did that if my analysis on the personal attack against opposer is so unpleasant and too honest. Besides, I did not know that you became a beuraucrat without any election campaign.--Caspian blue (talk) 23:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a bureaucrat, but I don't need to be one to remove off topic comments off the main RFA page. It's not your page, and it's not your place to order people about as to what they can and cannot do. -- how do you turn this on 23:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Also you are not an admin. You're not permitted to remove anyone's comment from the page. You don't own my comment and could not take away my free will to speak. Besides, do not follow me any more.--Caspian blue (talk) 23:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Maybe a language barrier is in play here? I think I understood the gist of Caspian's rant, but I couldn't be sure of the specifics...Tan | 39 23:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

So typical way.--Caspian blue (talk) 23:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I have no desire to continue talking to you... you are obviously so full of hate that people can't approach you or try to discuss things without being called a vandal or oppressor. I tried to explain that my comment was not intended as a personal attack, and that if you took it as such I apologized. I also tried to point out that your characterization of Tan was incorrect, but you are correct... we are oppressors. Ending this discussion please don't post here.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 23:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Your lecture

Your lecture does not earn some respect. One thing you made me upset most was you compared me with somebody whom I wonder why he are even permitted to edit Wikipedia. I know who you were referring to, and who is Kurt Webber. He is actually not indef.blocked, so please do say truth. He might've had zero support rate and I don't say like "power hunger, prima facie...blah blah.." The comparison is insulting and I consider your comments "personal attacks".[2] Providing diffs does not mean opposers could safely express their opinion without being badgered by supporters. They still accuse people in disagreement do see negative aspects too much or exaggerate some flaws of candidates. I've seen that practice too many, especially by this person. Moreover, "he acts like an admin" does not have any good in my opinion. Can you say that "a student acts like a professor" has a good meaning? Nope. You said you defended me in the supporter's side. Well, lately I opposed him to become an admin, so I don't care his intention for quoting me stems from his own feeling. Perhaps, supporters should do provide "diffs" to understand opposers. Have a good day.--Caspian blue (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

You're still going on about this? The rest of us had forgotten and were busy getting on with our lives. What's your purpose in bringing this up? Drop it, for goodness sake. -- how do you turn this on 15:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

lol, your comment is not even true given your continued interruption here and the time at which Ballonman left his comment about me[3] I left the above note 20 minutes after his comment there. Would you stop caring me and mind your own busy life? I replied to him as a courtesy for his lecture. You're the one who should knock it off. --Caspian blue (talk) 15:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I'd echo that. Enough Caspian Blue. Stop flogging the dead horse. Everyone has moved on except you. Pedro :  Chat  15:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Just leave me alone if you don't want more drama made by you guys. Why are you talking me behind my back?--Caspian blue (talk) 15:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad you find this funny, Caspian. -- how do you turn this on 15:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Er talking behind your back? I think not. I very publicly announced that I was going to wp:BN to fulfill your request to take your harassment off the RfA.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 20:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

First, if anybody is looking at these edits, it should be noted, that this is the lecture to which he refers. Second, Caspian, I've already asked you once to stop your continued harassment on my talk page... continued behavior and I will ask that you be blocked.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 20:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC) EDIT: I have formalized this request with a note on Caspian's talk page advising him that if he continues, I will take him to ANI. I expect the note to be deleted (his MO) so I preserve it here.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 20:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 2008: RfA

Hey, Balloonman. I'd like to be an admin, but I wonder if Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship is the way to go. If so, I'll read up on it and study it, attempt to pass, and try to know how to be a better Wiki Admin. Also, I'd like to ask you for a favour; is my history going to effect my nomination? Lastly, where can I find someone who would nominate me? Thanks for all your help, A _talk 22:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

teacher, I didn't do my homework..

... and I probably will be offline for a day or two. I'll try to get on it after that. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 01:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem... like I said, I take the long range approach to coaching... and homework is really of secondary importance... contributing to difference facets of the project and getting experience in a few adminly areas is much more importance.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 02:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply to RfA

Thanks an awful lot; I'll remember additions to edit summaries and remain neutral and impartial. Thanks for the tip, a lot. A _talk 21:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

DR

My close was to keep the article, overturning it would be to redirect which seems mutually exclusive with renaming. BJ^Talk 03:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks revised position.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 03:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching

Hi Balloonman, I'm looking for guidance on becoming an admin. I notice you are currently only coaching one potential admin at the moment. Would you be willing to take me on as well? Yours, Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 06:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

oh seems like I didn't come first but after reading (on the admin coaching page) that you're willing to accept more than one user ,I thought it wouldn't heart to ask if you could train me aswell. Alexnia (If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 19:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

What are you asking to be trained in? How to pass an RfA or how to be a good administrator? Shall I guess? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Both, actually.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 19:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, at least you're obviously (apparently) not another child wannabee admin candidate. Good luck. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 19:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I'll be happy to take a look at both of you, but it might be a few days before I get around to it. My time on wikipedia is a little limited lately.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 01:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Spartacus!. You have new messages at Alexnia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Ynhockey RFA

Hi, and thanks for the tip! In retrospect, I wish I saw this page before the nomination. Since the candidate's userpage pretty much details his contributions, I was afraid of "overselling" him. Is it considered appropriate to edit the nomination after the voting started? Cheers, Nudve (talk) 05:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

At this point, I would probably leave it as is... I was hoping that you could make those changes earlier on... I think enough people have seen the nom now that I would just leave it as is... Ynhockey is one of those candidates who I can't decide on... on the one hand, I want to support... on the other, his lack of experience and desire to work in areas with nominal experience are a concern... it's a case where I think a strong nom might have helped shaped people's first impressions. (The person who added the co-nom helped out.)---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Strange, somehow, I thought his record of over 25,000 mainspace edits would speak for itself. Now, after four years of positive contributions, he might start abusing admin tools and block users arbitrarily? Anyway, thanks again. Cheers, -- Nudve (talk) 05:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It's politics. Does 26 years of Senetorial Experience speak louder for John McCain, than rhetoric does for Obama? He looks like he's going to pass, he has the support of some of the people whose voices often doom candidates. But a well formed oppose which cited diffs could have done the candidate in.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 14:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Oi, I'd forgotten about this

Oh dearie me, my bloomers are showing here.

My position, then and now, is that there is neither a policy nor a guideline which prohibits making your User talk a redirect to your User page. If there is one now, then I'm pretty sure it didn't exist then. Either way, it's an egregious case of CREEP and needs to be resisted. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 01:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I owe you an RFA thanks...

... for your RfA commentary pages. Although you did not comment in my recent RfA, the advice you give there was of great asssitance to me in crafting my initial statement in my recent RfA. I also found the hints about not commenting on the opposes to be valuable (if difficult to follow) advice. I'm not not an RfA regular, and my nomination came upon unexpectedly, so I appreciated having those pages to quickly put together my RfA. Thanks for the insights! Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Now you have my curiosity up... if you aren't an RfA regular, how did you know that they existed? EG how did you find them?---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 14:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I just know how to ask for help... Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 15:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ynhockey 2

I have indented your duplicate !vote. Gary King (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

oops wasn't supposed to be an !vote, but a comment... thanks for indenting...---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 02:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

personal update

HI BalloonGuy,

• My Wikipedia participation in every area has dropped off recently, including in the admin coaching. recently I've been hit with a triple-whammy, mostly in real life. To wit:

1. I have been dealing with burnout issues with respect to Wikipedia. I'm feeling better, but still not 100%. Maybe I'm up to 65% or 70%. They were mainly caused by hardcore AWB work last month (see my contribs). I managed to get 8,000 of the 30,000+ articles on the CD spell-checked, but it messes with your mind and your energy after a while.
2. My wife has been repeatedly requesting that I spend more free time with her. :-)
3. I recently rec'd an email from the chair of my dissertation committee, outlining improvements that need to be made to my dissertation.

• Definitely do NOT want to drop the coaching, but I guess I'm a dstracted student at the moment. I hope it will all clear up within two weeks.

later Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 03:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Hehe... LOL... I was wondering about your recent activity... has seemed off a little. There is no rush...---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 03:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching

I see from the WP:Admin coaching/Status page that you have five coachees out of a total of two places. But then I never believe any statistics I read on Wikipedia unless my Mother tells me it's true as well. Do you have room for one more? Just to put the cards on the table, I also asked at User:Johann Wolfgang's talk page about a week ago, but his account seems to be dead at the moment. 18:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

I'll try to take a look at you tonight, but I have one other person who asked me first... so I need to do her first.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 02:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Congrats!

Hi Balloonman! Thank you very much for you support and warm comments on the RfA. To be honest, I also believed that it would turn into a political election, and was totally glad and relieved that the users supported or opposed based on WikiPerformance, experience, adherence to policy, etc. and not political views. I'm glad it's finally over, as now I have more time to edit articles and read/test admin tools in the designated areas (after finishing over 100 notes to users!). Cheers, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 22:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:OWU

Hello, I'm Spartacus!. You have new messages at Stepshep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§hep • ¡Talk to me! 04:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

let's wait two weeks

Hi Balloon Guy,

After two years on Wikipedia, I feel as though I am really and truly burned out. If you were to ask me at this exact moment, I would say that I should drop the admin training. But the problem is, I have no way of knowing whether this precipitous drop in energy level is a temporary bonk or a more prolonged burnout.

Let's wait two weeks. I'll ping you again at that time. If I still feel like crap, we'll put the admin training on the shelf for another day.

later! Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 14:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Let me know... just as an FYI, I would not be totally opposed towards your running without coaching. The more I looked at your edits, the more I realized that you are a strong candidate either way. (My concern was and is that displays of policy knowledge is a little limited.)---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 15:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words, and for all your time and attention! I think I'm gonna hang up my spurs for a while—perhaps as long as a couple months. We'll see later! Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 15:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Lol. No doubt you'll have spotted my latest nom under way... --Dweller (talk) 18:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I like your suggestion. Run it at WT:RFA as a proposed change to the template? --Dweller (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Not a bad idea... heck, it might be something just to be bold and add... I think consensus is that pre-votes are bad...this would be a sign to people to check first... I think the way people pre-vote is because they have the candidate's RfA page watchlisted and don't realize it hasn't gone live yet.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 18:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

See, by the time I get around to review your nom, it's already pretty much over... ergo, I probably won't even bother.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 04:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I dunno, you might want to oppose because the candidate has been reminding people to substitute their templates. Tan | 39 04:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, there is a better than average chance that I would support... I do have concerns about his lack of article building... but when I looked at him briefly at work, I noticed that he had a solid talk page and developed his communication... which are positives, but I didn't vet him well enough to !vote...and now that it's looking like it'll pass, I probably won't bother.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I was being sarcastic. You either didn't pick up on it, in which case, see oppose #3. Or, you picked up on it and decided to take the high road. :-) Tan | 39 05:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

No, I hadn't seen oppose #3... but now that I think about it... you do have a point... an oppose it is!!!---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!

File:Halloween Hush Puppies.jpg

Photograph of my Halloween-themed Hush Puppies plush basset hounds in my bedroom.

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 21:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)