User talk:I'm From England

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm From England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I not even been able to defend myself? Answer me honestly – have I caused the slightest bit of trouble?! No, this is not because I have created an account, it is merely because of who I used to be. Once again, is that fair!? I was told my account was to be reactivated on 21 January but someone changed that and I was not able to even edit my talk page [of LPC] and once again, was not able to defend myself just like now. I have changed and do not act like a child. The issue is that I deserve to be unblocked, new year, new start and so on :) Once again, within yesterdays [rather productive] edits, did I cause one bit of trouble..?..

Decline reason:

If you wish to request unblocking, you must do so from your original account at User talk:LouisPhilippeCharles. Favonian (talk) 13:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm From England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I have said I can not use the other account as it has been "locked" and only offers the chance to "view source". I deserve a chance to be fair. No one can tell me it is fair to ignore someone when they have done as much work as I have. It jus does not make sense

Decline reason:

Log into your first account account, LouisPhilippeCharles, and request unblocking on the talk page of that account, then we can talk. You will be able to edit User talk:LouisPhilippeCharles if logged into that account. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm From England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For the third time, the the LPC account is locked. I can not edit the page, it does not even have the edit tool bar there. I do not know why and I do not know how. Anyway, I have been patient and polite. If this was a sock puppet then I would have denied all existence of it. I have not done this. This is surely proof of the intent of my actions.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser confirmed sock of LouisPhilippeCharles. If you wish to be unblocked, please email the Arbitration Committee. TN X Man 22:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment

With regard to your intentions and attitude to sockpuppetry, this speaks volumes. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any history of that account's talk page being protected, nor is the LPC account under a solipsism block. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!)} 21:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm From England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Below is your proof!

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock. If you feel that the file you show disproves sockpuppetry you must explain your reasoning. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm From England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, was not thinking. The file I uploaded proves that I can not edit that LPC account. As I have pointed out, I have not been able to edit the page as it clearly states the account is locked for whatever reason. As a result, I have been forced to use this account and request an unblock here instead. As I had stated, this account was created because of that lock which for an unknown reason, been "locked" since roughly December. Anyway, I believe I should be unblocked as had this account been used a s sock puppet I would have denied its existence. Truth be told I have not done this in any way. Surely my honesty in the situation is proof of the intent of my actions which are not with any malice whatsoever

Decline reason:

You were told above by Tnxman307 to email the Arbitration Committee if you wanted to be unblocked. [stwalkerster|talk] 23:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm From England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The file I uploaded proves that I can not edit that LPC account. As I have pointed out, I have not been able to edit the page as it clearly states the account is locked for whatever reason. As a result, I have been forced to use this account and request an unblock here instead. As I had stated, this account was created because of that lock which for an unknown reason, been "locked" since roughly December. Anyway, I believe I should be unblocked as had this account been used as a sock puppet I would have denied its existence. I have not done this in any way. Surely my honesty in the situation is proof of the intent of my actions which are not with any malice whatsoever. Even though just asked to email the committee, I do not even have an email address! I almost feel as though I am being victimised :\

Decline reason:

So create an email account. There are many free email providers out there; use one. Meanwhile, if it's possible, you're digging yourself in even deeper. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is that really fair? I do not even have an email address or account =\ I'm From England (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

You have been told to email ArbCom if you wish to request unblocking. You therefore have no further use for this talk page, and as you persist in removing the declined unblock requests in spite of being told not to, I've revoked your permission to edit it. Favonian (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]