Jump to content

User talk:Hyperspeed2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Hyperspeed2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

Hyperspeed2000, you have given wikipedia alot of information in just about two months. The article on Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea is very intricate. How did you come across all of this information? I am astounded because I can't even find a Spanish version! Thank you so much. I am very interested in these areas as well. May I ask about your background? C.Kent87 (talk) 08:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AGyHM-P Gala Dinner.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AGyHM-P Gala Dinner.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea

[edit]

Template:Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Garcia Salinas

[edit]

Many thanks for your input in this article on the discussion page. If you know of an image that we can use for the article then we would be grateful to you if you could load it to the commons. Richard Avery (talk) 23:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea

[edit]

Hi!! Regarding your "editing some of the minor changes recently made" on the Lancaster-Jones article, you managed somehow to restore the POV, cruft, hyperbole and redlinks (of which there are still an overwhelming number) which were removed for a reason -- to enhance the article's clarity, navigability and to make it more encyclopaedic. Your respect for the gentleman and your enthusiasm are appreciated. I do not wish to get into an edit war, so let's try to compromise and make the article better for posterity.

Yours, Quis separabit? 03:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quis separabit?!!
I appreciate you took the time in looking at the article. To search for the quality of any article is indeed an ideal of every contributor.
1) When you write: "...you managed somehow to restore..." Let me point that I didn't restore the article to the old version (I didn't "undo"), I accepted your contributions in redaction (the form of writing) when those changes doesn't affect the content (information, dates, etc.). The changes I made were those who affected the article's content.
An example (there are many more):
So, as you see, I appreciated your kind contribution, and I just recovered the information you removed.
2) I wonder the reason why you keep on erasing information? As one thing is the orthography and the form of an article, but it's different when you change the structure and remove numerous information on the article. Therefore truncating the article. A thorough form of editing would be translating an article in to another language: but the translator should never erase or omit the original contents of the material he/she is translating and, while translating they re-write the whole thing, but they don't erase or omit information at their own will.
3) If making "the article better for posterity" means for you to delete information in such article and to add confusing or wrong paragraphs... I don't agree!
Two examples of what I'm talking about (I can give you many more):
a) You erased the "Ex Libris" subsection:
"Ex Libris"
"His Ex Libris (Bookplate) was designed by the artist Carlos Stahl (1892–1984); it was catalogued in 1970 by the Mexican academic José Miguel Quintana (1908–1987) in Libros Mexicanos".[1]
b) You changed the time period of an event mentioned in the Major contributions subsection; inside the paragraph titled: "1941 – Documents of Our Lady of Zapopan..." The event I'm talking about happened during the Cristero War which took place between 1926 to 1929 so you confuse everyone when you say: "They were secreted for safe keeping during Mexico's 19th and 20th century political upheavals". The Cristero War lasted only for three years (1926 to 1929), not during two centuries as you state.
I say such activities (to delete information and to add confusing or wrong paragraphs) obstruct the article's content, and act against the very purpose of an Encyclopaedia that is to share all information as veridic (truthful) as possible and: sharing is not erasing.
In the name of orthography, grammar, or redaction, the contents of any article should never be erased nor any contributor threatened as to declare "a war" on him/she if he/she attempts to recover the information that has been deleted by anyone without fundaments or reasons.
4) One thing is to correct grammar and redaction, I thank you for that and appreciate it!
But you can't change and erase the information at your own will. An article with less information, is less rich and if the information exists and it's deleted that's not encyclopaedic.
5) Among many other structural changes you made, I'd like to know which reasons you took in consideration for moving a subsection "Marriage" in to a section?
In this last question, let me put as example Winston Churchill's biography: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill ], the first section is: "1 Family and early life", the second subsection is: "1.2 Marriage and children"... I wonder why you don't erase information there and change the sections and subsections?
Following Churchill's biography as a model, in the inside the section "Family", of Lancaster-Jones' biography, there must be a subsection "Marriage" (not another new section)...
I can keep on pointing you many reasons about why I structured Lancaster-Jones' biography that way...
Finally: Honestly, I don't understand why you erased and changed information from this article. Please: stop cutting off and therefore truncating the article's information. This kind of actions doesn't enrich the article at all. Advanced thanks!
Kind Regards!
Yours, Hyperspeed2000 (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Why do you restored the Disease-related deaths in Mexico category? I removed it from Lancaster-Jones' biography as I stated in the Edit summary note (22:20, 7 February 2012‎): "inappropriate category removed due to Lancaster-Jones' published biographies (he didn't die because of a disease)". According one of the published biographical notes, Ricardo Lancaster-Jones had some health problems in late 1978; after he recovered, he didn't continued with the PhD degree; and, as you can see, he died until 1983... By the way, I also included a reference about it: [2]... But once more, you removed this reference!
Again: Is this your idea of make the article better for posterity?
Sincerely, Hyperspeed2000 (talk) 12:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Artes de México" magazine, No. 131, Year XVII, 1970, p. 102.
  2. ^ Agraz García de Alba, Gabriel; "Evocación de Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea", Academia Mexicana de Genealogía y Heráldica, Mexico City, 1984, p. 8.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hyperspeed2000&oldid=1083955871"