User talk:Hypernova971

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Tax noncompliance, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm RedPanda25. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tommy McLaren without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Red Panda 25 18:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion tags

I suggest you have a look at the deletion policy to see the kinds of reasons why articles can be deleted on Wikipedia. We only delete pages summarily (using the template you've added to a few articles) if they meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Being short is not a reason for deletion, and the fact that buttocks contains pictures of buttocks is certainly not a reason to delete it (WP:NOT#CENSORED). Hut 8.5 22:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did I do anything in the past that could get me blocked if i repeat it

Unsuitable humour

I assume that your editing at Sentence clause structure was meant to be a joke. If so, please don't make joke edits to Wikipedia articles. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion tags again

Please don't put any more speedy deletion tags on pages without first checking that the page actually qualifies under one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion. The deletion policy, to which you have already been given a link, explains the various deletion processes, of which speedy deletion is only one. I also suggest that you don't nominate any pages for deletion until you have enough experience to know what reasons are likely to be considered suitable. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:19, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Division by zero. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 18:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Toilet paper orientation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Toilet paper orientation was changed by Hypernova971 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872847 on 2018-12-05T18:04:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gilliam, Ferret, this is CU-confirmed with User:Finball30 and User:Hypernova403. Gilliam, underneath is a range you blocked as a schoolblock early March--don't know if that matters to you or not. I'm not sure if we should start an SPI; I'm not feeling paperworky this morning. Drmies (talk) 18:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hypernova971 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Toilet paper orientation is not something that belongs in an encyclopedia. I blanked it as it should be deleted as its unsuitable for an encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Scott (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hypernova971 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry that I made a disruptive edit to wikipedia. I will not make any more disruptive edits in the future if you unblock me from editing. Thank you. Hypernova971 (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Hypernova971 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23517 was submitted on Dec 08, 2018 18:42:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]