User talk:Hyperglyph

Welcome!

Hello, Hyperglyph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:53, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Hyperglyph, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 10:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Durham (poem) translation

Hi Hyperglyph -- thanks for adding the translation to Durham (poem) -- unfortunately it appears to be in copyright, according to the website you linked, and so can't be used on Wikipedia. I'll add it as external link so that people can read it. I'm still seeking a clearly out-of-copyright translation for it. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ETA Ah, now I'm confused! These pages state the site provides "open-access translations" [1],[2] but the poem itself has a clear copyright statement at the bottom. Will investigate further... Espresso Addict (talk) 12:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd thought it was a freely available scholar's resource, since the professor's disclaimer described it as "open access" & meant for "students". I totally missed the copyright claim at the bottom. Thanks for fixing my work. Hyperglyph (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the copyright is a generic stamp for Rutger's entire website? That's a stretch though. You're probably right to err on the side of caution. Hyperglyph (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding -- unfortunately we do have to err on the side of caution. Even if the author is happy for it to be copied for the use of students, the commercial part of our licence would not be covered. At least the link will let people understand the poem now! Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Monique Wilson (witch)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Monique Wilson (witch).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Monique Wilson (witch), but note that other editors have questioned whether this person qualifies for a Wikipedia article. Follow the links in the notice at the top of the page. If this issue is not addressed, future editors may call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monique Wilson (witch) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monique Wilson (witch) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Wilson (witch) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paisarepa (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]