User talk:Hymn62
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Hymn62, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent edit to an article that is part of the Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject. We welcome your contributions and hope that you will stay and contribute more. Here are some links that I found helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia and Tutorial on editing
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Policies and Guidelines
- Manual of Style
- Manual of Style (Latter Day Saints)
- Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints)
If you run into a dispute, please use the Talk pages and the Latter Day Saint movement project talk page to discuss subjects (especially controversial ones) to help reach consensus. But don't be afraid to be bold!! Also, as new Mormonism-related articles are created, please make sure to add them to List of Latter Day Saint movement topics.
Remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —Asterisk*Splat→ 16:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Earl Avery Thompson
[edit]Hello, Hymn62. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Earl Avery Thompson".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hymn62. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
MERCON
[edit]Hi, Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. You're article MERCON looks really good, can't wait until it's finished! It looks like a real High quality article. Please make sure that when you're done you've added references, as annoying as it can be sometimes, it is required that all articles on Wikipedia are based on reliable sources. Kind regards, TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding references, the article looks really really good. TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mopar Automatic Transmission Fluid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ZF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]Your recent editing history at Automatic transmission fluid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. INeedSupport :3 17:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ContentEditman
[edit]As info, I have reported ContentEditman for the users edit Warring and Sockpuppetry. I see that your edits had already gained consensus in the talk pages only to be reverted multiple times by ContentEditman. Should you choose to revert to the prior consensus edit you had made AND this editor or any potential sockpuppets of ContentEditman revert again, you may wish to make additional edit Warring reports and/or add supplemental comments on the Puppetmaster's report page. Thanks and happy editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:DC00:14D0:19B1:D5BB:25A4:6AA3 (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Transmission fluid pages
[edit]Please see the talk pages at the transmission fluid pages to discuss the edits. Thanks ContentEditman (talk) 02:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- nothing to undo, when not tested by the license owner, he would not sub license the product. However, least to protect his own customers. --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 20:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
[edit]The Automotive Barnstar | ||
Thank you for such useful information! Guiletheme (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Nomination of Toyota Automatic Transmission Fluid for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota Automatic Transmission Fluid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Jay D. Easy (t) 01:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Chrysler Automatic Transmission Fluids for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrysler Automatic Transmission Fluids until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.