User talk:Hydromasta231

Meant to ask here, "Are you new to wikipedia?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonball1986 (talk • contribs)

I've made a few edits on anime pages using my IP Address, but with the OP Attack List being deleted, I decided to take advantage of it to clean up the other anime pages. I though my attempts would be more credable if I made a named account, but apparently that just made me less credable. I wonder if I should have just stuck to my IP Address... Hydromasta231 06:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible canvassing

While I'm sure you have the best of intentions, it is generally not a good idea to leave messages on user's talk pages regarding AFDs they are not currently participating in. Some people might possibly see this as canvassing. Wickethewok 05:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize this was looked down upon. I won't do that again. I simply thought it would be a good idea to bring it to their attention. Hydromasta231 06:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DBZ Attacks

Thank you for the notice of this most interesting AFD, my dear sir. I do love a good argument, especially when it's a controversy, and especially about listcruft. (The horror!) However, as per spamming guidelines, you should probably refrain from canvassing for votes in the future, unless you are going to take pains to inform voters on both sides. (Which I notice you haven't in this case.) If you continue to solicit votes from only the one side, someone may take an unpleasant kind of notice and refer you to ArbCom. Nobody wants that; in future I would recommend just letting the AFD proceed organically, without large-scale intervention.

(That said, as per WP:SPAM, I would appreciate a "friendly notice" in the case of other listcruft AFDs, as I am an editor "who share[s] your taste and/or philosophy" in deletion.) Any questions, just hit my Talk. ♠P M C♠ 06:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'll send notices to the people for the attack lists too. Hydromasta231 07:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, as an administrator, I'd say that the best thing to do in future is just leave AfD debates to resolve naturally. Most people don't want to be notified about current AfDs. If they were interested, they would likely hunt them down on their own. It's like getting spam emails - you may well be interested in cheap prescription drugs, but you don't necessarily want your inbox filled with messages about them. Most people prefer to find things on their own. (But, like I said, I personally am too lazy to dredge AfD, so you can feel free to tell me about like AfDs.) ♠P M C♠ 22:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Freak

Hey dude, don't go nominating AFDs around the place using One Piece Attacks as your precedent. You may not like those stuff but their are alot of other people who do. Also don't go spam my talk page like that!!CalicoD.Sparrow 08:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]