User talk:HydroGrowPRO

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, HydroGrowPRO, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "HydroGrowPRO", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is the name of a company, group, organization or website. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

content

Yes, all content, but particularly content that has been challenged must have a citation to a reliably published source with a reputation for fact checking and editorial oversight before being restored to an article.

And EVEN IF you have a source that supports your claims, if there are other, equally or more reliable sources that state otherwise, your claims may not be worthy of being included or might need to be presented as just one of many alternate theories. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the link to our page that describes reliable sources? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If we take a look at your claim that "parkour is american and not french", since every source that I have ever seen about the sport identifies it as french, you will need about a half dozen Oxford/Yale/Sarbone level scholars of sports history to have written that is is american and not french before the "american origin" theory would even merit a mention as an alternate hypothesis . -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]