Jump to content

User talk:Hybrid theory 100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ln of x (talkcontribsblock logcreation log).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hybrid theory 100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Some Admins; AnemoneProjectors, philippe, Fisherqueen and isotope 23 have been abusing their position. The first 3 have caused mass vandalism and disruption to the Abi Branning page by blanking text and removing vital information about her personality. The last admin, isotope 23, removed an unblock request. I believe he should be blocked outright for that, indef. You can't juct do that. I'd like to be unblocked since I have no idea why I was blocked, when all my edits were perfectly legitimite.

Decline reason:

The unblock template is not to be used to make accusations against others but to show why your block is not valid. You do indeed appear to be a sockpuppet of Ln of x (talk · contribs) and thus you are in blatant violation of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. — Yamla 15:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hybrid theory 100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No, I think these corrupt admins should be dealt with. My block is invalid because I was blocked for 'vadalism' but i wasnt vandalising - my edits were true and valid. I had to resort to sockpuppets as i was so unfairly blocked. What else could i have done ? I tried to get unblocked then, before i created sockpupets but they wouldnt unblosk me. There was no other option.

Decline reason:

You are abusing the unblock template. And your deliberate violation of WP:SOCK will not be tolerated. Contact an WP:ARBCOM member if you wish to dispute your original block. Note, though, that your continued use of sockpuppets shows that it would be inappropriate to unblock you. — Yamla 15:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.