Jump to content

User talk:Hyacynthus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Hyacynthus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dr Science Geek (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hyacynthus, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Hyacynthus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monotypic genus articles

[edit]

Hi, welcome to editing! Your contributions will surely help out around here. I noticed you recently converted Sanzinia from a redirect to an article stub. For monotypic genera, this results in two articles that essentially cover the same thing, forcing readers to navigate two pages to get information on one species. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject_Amphibians_and_Reptiles#Criteria_for_inclusion and the more general guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life#Article_titles. If a monotypic genus acquires future species, then it might be reasonable to have a separate genus article which directs to the descendent species. In short, it's generally preferable to have information more centralized and easily found. If you agree, consider merging the two articles as before. Cheers! --Animalparty-- (talk) 09:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Micropisthodon has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Micropisthodon. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Micropisthodon has been accepted

[edit]
Micropisthodon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]