User talk:Hwasus

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A27 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hospital of Chania.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hospital of Chania.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop uploading images

Hwasus, every image you have uploaded has been deleted and you need to realize why. You cannot take images from websites, upload them here, and claim that they are either self-made or under a free licence. ALL images you take off websites or from any other source are copyrighted. They must be noted as such and meet all 10 of the non-free content criteria. If you keep on uploading images here, that get deleted as copyright violations, you may find yourself blocked from both uploading and editing Wikipedia. - Peripitus (Talk) 05:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 protests in Turkey

you have to undo your move. its against consensus. there was a section in talk page about renaming. please refer to talk page first. KazekageTR (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Yet again you are uploading copyright violations *[:File:White tower in Thessaloniki.jpg] is watermarked from a website *[:File:Thessaloniki-OTE-Tower.jpg] is watermarked from the same website *[:File:Symis island.jpg] is a downscaled version of the shutterstock image from here *[:File:Athens from the air.jpg is from some stock photography site but there are so many similar images I don't know which one as for the rest - I tire of this and am assuming that ALL of the images you upload are taken from websites. I have blocked you from editing for two weeks and hope that you use the time to acquaint yourself with the truth that images from websites are not ok to take and just upload here as you have. - Peripitus (Talk) 20:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peripitus (Talk) 20:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Civil War general sanctions

As a result of a community decision, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War. These sanctions are described at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:

Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban.
A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listed here.
Please familiarise yourself with the full decision at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War.
Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.

Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Australia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. All content must be verifiable and the addition that you made to Australia is not supported by the source used in the article AussieLegend (✉) 04:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You broke the one revert rule, so self-revert this edit you made reverting my changes in 1 hour or less or I will report you for breaking WP rules repeatedly (you have been warned about the sanctions in Syrian civil war articles, but it seems that you dont care about it).--HC PUNXKID 00:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--HC PUNXKID 02:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Hwasus (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Athens Riviera.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Athens Riviera.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — lfdder 16:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Greek Riviera marina.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Greek Riviera marina.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — lfdder 16:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sidewalks in greek riviera.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sidewalks in greek riviera.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — lfdder 16:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

blocked again - no time limit this time

Hi Hwasus, you appear to have ignored the two previous blocks for copyright violation and just continued. You have taken images from other websites, thankfully noting the source, and claimed they are under a creative-commons licence. This is simply incorrect. Such images are (c) all-rights-reserved and CANNOT be uploaded here with a "free licence" or a claim that you made them. If you want to be unblocked, you will need to add an {{unblock}} template to this page and

convince an administrator that you understand why you are blocked and
convince them that you will stop doing it.

- Peripitus (Talk) 22:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hwasus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I have been blocked from Peripitus with no time limit.I think that it is unfair because with this i can't edit any page and because no time limit means that i can't edit a page forever.However i think that it's ok to be blocked (My mistake) but I want to be blocked with a time limit....I hope to understand me.

Decline reason:

Indefinite is not infinte. There is, in fact, a time limit on your block: it will be lifted when you demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked, and are able to provide assurance that the behavior that led to your block will not be repeated when the block is lifted. This is why your block is not time limited: your request here amounts to "please let my block expire so I can resume my violations of Wikipedia's copyright policy". The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the previous contents of this page. Please do not blank content related to your block while you are appealing the block. This content must stay so that administrators can evaluate what happened. If you continue to blank block-related content, you may lose your ability to edit this page. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]