Jump to content

User talk:Hvant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

[edit]
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hvant. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Hvant! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 09:40, Wednesday, September 14, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together
[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mean as custard (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Hvant, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Second Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 13:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rare breed (agriculture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Production system. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

[edit]

Hi! Thanks for creating Transboundary breed (I've moved it to that title as it is not a proper name, so doesn't need a capital "B" for breed). I see that you've tried to add some links to it. Unfortunately, you've tried to add them inside existing weblinks. That just won't work – it doesn't wikilink to the internal page, and it messes up the display of the weblink. So I'm afraid I've undone those edits. Please don't let that discourage you from making more contributions. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://dad.fao.org/cgi-bin/getblob.cgi?sid=-1,50006167 https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/3141/WP_26.pdf?sequence=1 http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/026/me546e.pdf and possibly elsewhere, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have already had a warning from Diannaa about this, and I'm perturbed to see that this page was created well after that warning. The first document listed above carries a clear statement that "Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders" and also a copyright claim, "© FAO 2001". Just to be completely clear:
  • Everything you write in Wikipedia must be expressed in your own words
  • you may not copy copyright material into Wikipedia, and
  • if you do, you risk the suspension of your editing privileges.
If you think there may be other articles where you have copied directly from your sources, please list them here, on this page, so that they can be cleaned up. That would be very helpful. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Justlettersandnumbers (talk thank you for your concern. I will work on re-wording some of these "copyrighted" sentences. It was definitely not my intention to do anything of the sort. Perhaps the content in some cases is just too specific to be changed to a great extent. I will work on this issue asap. Please reconsider flagging this page as copyrighted material. Otherwise, I am happy to ask the FAO copyright department to write an email expressing their permission for publishing this page. Hvant (talk) 10:49, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, the content is never too specific to be rewritten in your own words (that's a claim we often hear, but it's never – to date – proved to be true). I've left a link to place for a rewrite, and the place for FAO management to read about donating materials (if they want to), at Talk:The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. If you think there may be other articles where you have copied directly from your sources, please list them here, on this page, so that they can be cleaned up. That would be very helpful. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Hvant. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello, thank you for your message. I will definitely post my work affiliation with the FAO of the UN, as soon as I figure out how to do it! Please stop deletiing my pages that I have worked very hard on! :( Hvant (talk) 22:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I did not delete any of your pages, but you may prevent future deletions by submitting articles as drafts first, where they can be reviewed for suitability and copyright infringement before going "live". In short, you should not be using Wikipedia as free web-hosting to promote ("increase awareness of") initiatives of the FAO, no matter how important or noteworthy you may think they are. (Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion). Articles of any type should primarily be sourced from secondary sources, per policy. Many of your articles could easily be mistaken for content on official FAO websites, e.g. Second Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources and Food and Agriculture Policy Decision Analysis and Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Suitable subjects from articles should have significant, third party coverage in multiple sources. Articles about FAO subjects should not be primarily sourced by FAO documents, as they are primary sources, possibly biased, and may result in bloated, overly detailed coverage of subjects of interest to only a very small number of readers. Please see related guidelines and policies on Notability, spam, and What Wikipedia is not. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Funding Strategy for the Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Funding Strategy for the Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/genetics/first_call.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Justlettersandnumbers but I worked very hard on that article, and while yes it does have the project titles copied, everything else has been written by FAO staff members and myself who would like this information to be accessible to wikipedia users. The projects themselves are very specific, and so are the guidelines regarding the funding strategy. Thus, it is impossible to create brand new material. I thought the point of wikipedia was to share knowledge to benefit everyone, and that this knowledge is verified by direct sources- hence it being an encyclopedia. I can think of no one better to write pages about FAO and UN projects than FAO employees themselves. So please explain to me how I can successfully publish this information that we would like others to benefit from? It can not be as simple as re-writing it, as I am sure you will find some form of copyright and just delete it again. :( losing hope here. Kind regards, Hvant (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hvant, the only reason I didn't immediately ask for you to be indefinitely blocked from editing when I saw that you had written yet another page with massive copying from the source (not just project titles as you suggest) is that I know that you're trying to help here. I'm going to make some comments or suggestions. They may sound a bit harsh, but they're intended to help you get started as a productive editor.
  • Everything you write in Wikipedia must be in your own words; I've told you this before, and so has Diannaa. Please understand that you may not copy chunks of text from copyright publications, and that if you do so repeatedly it is really extremely unlikely that you will be allowed to continue editing.
  • The replacement article you have written at Talk:The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture/Temp cannot be used, as it contains copyright violations of this page (at least) – see the results of this tool
  • You have a WP:conflict of interest in relation to the FAO and all it does. Neither you nor anyone else at the FAO should be trying to promote/ publicise/ divulge its projects and activities here
  • That doesn't mean that those activities are not valuable (as it happens, they are a particular interest of mine and very close to my heart – I've cited FAO publications many, many hundreds of times here); it just means that you and your colleagues there are absolutely not the right people to write about them (you can think of no one better to write pages about the FAO than its employees; Wikipedia can – more or less – think of no-one worse – please read WP:N)
  • Wikipedia does not tolerate promotion of any kind, even of worthy causes or activities
  • You are always welcome, at any time, to propose changes on the talk-pages of articles. You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources, or are unduly long, are unlikely to be accepted.
  • You could, for example, try selecting one simple and significant fact that is missing from a page (say, the FAO page itself), find an independent source (or several sources) that supports it, and make a request on the talk-page to add one clear, concise and well-written sentence to the article. By "independent", I mean "not in any way connected with the FAO itself".
  • Whenever you do that, you must declare your conflict of interest.
I'm going to leave you an invitation below; please consider accepting it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Hvant, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. It's a good place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please give it a try! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


A wild thought

[edit]

Since I'm here (on your page) and you are there (at the FAO), a wild thought crossed my mind: would you like to find out if there is any vestige of a chance that photos such as this could be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons? They'd have to be under a licence such as CC-BY-SA 4.0 that allows commercial use, so quite different from the way they are currently licenced. I don't imagine there's any possibility this could be done, but it would make a huge difference to this project if it could (it's extremely difficult to find free photos of rare breeds, and many of our articles are without illustration for that reason). It would (1) reflect well on the FAO (2) be extremely helpful and (3) help to spread knowledge of, and interest in, rare livestock breeds. It'd be a lot of work, too. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi talk I like this wild thought. I actually looked into this option while I was there, and unfortunately, FAO's copyright policy is very stringent, and they did not seem very willing to change their entire copyright policy just for wikipedia. Their email is copyright@fao.org I believe. I will mention your idea to my supervisor though, as it is nice to hear that wikipedia is interested in collaborating. I agree it would reflect well on FAO and your other 2 points of course. Hvant (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture/Temp

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture/Temp, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://dad.fao.org/cgi-bin/getblob.cgi?sid=-1,50006167. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

[edit]

Hello, Hvant. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Hvant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hvant&oldid=875184279"