User talk:Hutchi333

Help request from a newbie with a COI

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Hutchi333 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Troubadour Goods.

Hi there,

Any helpful advice would be much appreciated – I am completely new to Wikipedia editing.

I work with a company called Troubadour Goods, which designs and manufactures accessories, and would like to suggest that an article about this company be created (Category: Leather manufacturers). I understand the need to disclose my conflict of interest and am seeking advice on how such an article could be added to Wikipedia.

I have written a draft article (with references) and appreciate the need for objectivity, so I would like to know how best to share it with editors who can review it from a genuinely neutral point of view. Is this best done via my Sandbox?

Many thanks.

Hutchi333 (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the article wizard which creates a draft version and, when finished submit it to WP:AFC for review by more experienced editors. Please be sure you read WP:Your first article before creating a draft. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Troubadour Goods (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too suggestive of an advert. Doesn't even seem notable enough

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Troubadour Goods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hutchi333, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yashovardhan (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Troubadour Goods

Draft:Troubadour Goods, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Troubadour Goods and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Troubadour Goods during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 07:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]