User talk:Hut101

Talk:Midnight Yell Practice

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Midnight Yell Practice. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 22:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Nice to see another Ag on Wikipedia. You seem to be editing very well. If you need help with anything, I'll be glad to be your coeditor. Have fun! Blueag9 06:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Texas tags

If I may inquire, why have you removed the WikiProject Texas tags from the various Aggie traditions articles? - Raetzsch 21:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There has been little discussion on their project page in the last several months except for a few who are only requesting peer reviews. There seems to be no constructive cooperation by its members to improve a given article. The chance of several member of that project to decide cooperatively that they need to improve A&M articles is very unlikely. I see no point in cluttering the discussion page with a link that says A&M articles are part of the Texas Project when the Texas Project couldn’t care less. -- Hut101 02:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I care! Johntex\^talk 05:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hut, thanks for your message. I definitely sypathize with your concern about potentially irrelevant templates clogging up the articles. I am just shocked that the Texas WikiProject has become so inactive. We used to be very active. It makes me sad and I guess I am unhappy with myself for letting this happen. I'm going to see what I can do to revive it. I know there are lots of Texans here on Wikipedia. Maybe we just like to go our own way vs. collaborating on a project. (Lone cowboys on the range perhaps?) In any case - I am definitely happy to help with Texas A&M articles. A collaboration around them would be great. What did you have in mind? Johntex\^talk 06:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reveille and Bevo both sound like great ideas. I just googled "Reveille V" and got 480 Goodle hits and she is not really covered yet in the Reveille article. I'd love to get to the bottom of the Bevo name if it is possible. It may be impossible given that even UT sources disagree. I'm on board to work with you on either of them.

I'd like to throw one more idea into the mix. UT's first mascot was not a steer, it was a dog named Pig. So, at some point before or after the other two - we could build the Pig article, literally from nothing, if you're interested. Johntex\^talk 06:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hut - thanks for the reply. Sorry, I overlooked your post at first because several messages came in right after yours. I didn't look high enough up the page. That is some good stuff. I will look into all the links you sent. With respect to the Alcalde, they don't have ancient articles available on-line, as far as I can tell. I no longer live in Austin (poor me) but I could enlist one our other UT-WikProject members to try to delve into the Alcalde's records. One of our members even works for the alumni center. Don't worry about the Pig article. It was just an idea. There is no reason for you to force yourself to work on a topic that does not interest you. We have plenty of other good suggestions. I could be convinced to go with any of them. My suggestion would be to start with throwing our efforts into one of the mascots just because they seem like smaller bites to chew on vs taking on getting the two universities to FA status. We should be able to get one or both of the mascots to GA or even FA status because it should be reasonably possible to cover the topic comprehensively. With regards to Bevo, there is actually construction under-way on a Bevo museum as part of our stadium expansion. That will be a bonanza when it is finished. Johntex\^talk 03:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That all sounds great. It would be awesome to find the hide stored away there at A&M somewhere. Almost as good would be photo from the banquet showing what the hide said when they served up the beef. I'll talk to some people about the Alcalde search and I'll pass along what we find - same with anything we uncover about Reveille. Johntex\^talk 04:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - FYI the whole Bevo thing boils down to this: A&M branded the castrated mascot with 13-0. A few years thereafter, the name Bevo stuck. While several people made proclamations regarding the name, it was not official until 1919ish. The origin of the name is unclear at best and has several possible sources. The fact that there are records of the 13-0 hide being given to A&M leads me to believe the most popular Aggie tale is fiction BQZip01 15:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Thank you!

I have many photos from the 2006 Lone Star Shootout. I'm finally getting around to uploading a few. I think we should go through the A&M article and upload the best free photos to commons. You've got to love the Figtin' Texas Aggie Band. They are truly a unique tradition and something special for the whole state of Texas. I have lots more photos of the Aggie band.

Speaking of which, why don't they get a link from the main A&M page? I know a lot of material got split off into the "Traditions" article, but it seems to me that the school band needs to be mentioned on the main University page. Johntex\^talk 05:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Texas A&M Tradition

Template:Texas A&M Tradition has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --NMajdan•talk 22:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Texas A&M Aggies football

Hi, I created this article and would love your help in expanding it. Thanks! --Blueag9 01:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Texas A&M

Howdy. Sorry, I've been on a hiatus (more or less) for awhile. I'm wondering - since you seem to be rather ambitious in regard to A&M-related changes - do you have any sort of plan for organizing people? Something along the lines of a WikiProject would be nice, I would think, since a decent number of Aggies seem to be roaming Wikipeida nowadays. At any rate, let me know what you have done to organize people, and I'll be happy to fall in line. -- EdisonLBM 04:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikiproject sounds like a great idea. I think more Aggies should commit to editing A&M-related articles though. About the Wikicommons, do I have to re-upload my images there? I am not familiar with it. I am going to take more pictures soon.

I believe the ResearchValley.org is the official website. The agency's official name is "Research Valley Partnership." That website is also posted on the College Station Governmental Links page. By the way, what do you think of the 12th Man Statue picture I took? Do you think a picture of it in daylight would look better? I also took a picture of the Reveille cemetery. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blueag9 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

My bad, at first I was thinking maybe readers would get confused as to which campus the notable people received degrees from, but then it hit me that they all receive identical degrees. I put the sections back. --Blueag9\^talk 08:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TAMU userbox

Neat picture, don't you think? Sucrine created it. You should add it to your page like I did. --Blueag9\^talk 11:29, 6 November 2024 UTC [refresh]

BQZip01 Message

I don't spend a lot of time each day, maybe about a half hour (except big edits, which I tinker with whenever I have spare time). Right now I am watching about 50 articles and just keeping them clean from vandalism and other #$&^. I'm in the military, but the job I'm currently assigned to only takes about 4 hours a day (my boss doesn't manage time/people well), so I ahve plenty of free time to work on things like this. BQZip01 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added a LOT to the Texas A&M Corps of Cadets webpage. Made the rank myself BQZip01 20:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

		Award
		I, Blueag9, award this Barnstar to Hut01 for his great efforts in improving Texas A&M-related articles. Gig 'em!

Userbox template

I created this template to use for the colleges of the university. A sample of it being used is here. Feel free to add/edit it. I have a lot of free time on my hands :)Blueag9\^talk 10:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and you're welcome

Hi Hut, thanks for your message. You are very welcome. I try to help out when I can. I understand that this user is trying to tidy things up, but I think they went a little overboard. I undid a few of their similar edits related to Cornell as well. This user seems to have done similar things to other universities and other topics in the past. According to his user page, he considers himself a "deletionist". He is apparently quite proud of a mass deletion he once accomplished regarding transmission towers.

One of the problems with Wikipedia is that we have conflicting rules. We have all these style guides and so on but then we have WP:Bold that can seem like a cover for someone to just do what they want to do. We have all these policies, but then we have WP:IAR. In a sense, he did things by the book in terms of marking things either Prod or AfD. Therefore, while I think his behavior was non-ideal, I can't really emphatically state it was against the rules.

I'll try to check in on him in a few days/weeks and see what he is up to. Johntex\^talk 00:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

Are you going to be back to editing this summer? I know I will, at least for a short while.--Blueag9 (Talk | contribs) 06:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Bull story

Thought you would get a kick out of this joke and story. — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fish can get away with stuff when they outnumber upperclassmen 10, 15, or 20 to 1; there is strength in numbers. I think they were taking it easy on us after the rough week we had (rough times in the corps like the week before this, especially in the first few months, tend to see freshmen quit the following week). — BQZip01 — ^talk 15:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image placement

You can change them back if you like. I just changed them to follow the article's alternating pattern of putting the images on the left and right. BlueAg09 (Talk) 23:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campus page

What do you say we go ahead and start the Campus of Texas A&M University article? I say we move the notable buildings section to that article, and leave the campus picture on the main article. On this new article we can have the freedom to expand a bit and maybe add more buildings. BlueAg09 (Talk) 23:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking maybe we can follow the format on the Campus of Michigan State University article. Things to include could be history, transportation, and notable buildings. BlueAg09 (Talk) 23:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are good A&M books at Evans and Cushing that have some info about campus history. When I get the chance, I'll check them out sometime. BlueAg09 (Talk) 23:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see link above. I'll be away from the keyboard for a few. BlueAg09 (Talk) 00:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MOS question

Yeah, I'm working on that. — BQZip01 — ^talk 01:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

another edit you didn't agree to

Please check the A&M talk page and ensure that you agree with the last change to the History section. I think it's a doozie that needs fixing. If you agree then I'll do them all real quick-like :-) Gimmee a heads up on my talk page when done. — BQZip01 — ^talk 01:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SGA

I worry that Student Government Association at Texas A&M University might be listed for deletion since it might be non-notable. Let's make sure it fits the criterion under Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). BlueAg09 (Talk) 07:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finish Texas A&M University article

This is a request to assist in finishing the Texas A&M University article for FA status. We need just a couple of people to read the article and the discussion and then sign off the remaining items to be checked. Once this is done, we will submit for Featured Article status. Even just checking off one item would help, so please do what you can — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newest FA candidate...well...not yet...

All, I have significantly updated/upgraded the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band page. It still needs work, but is a vast improvement from the previous version. I'd really like to do this page myself so ya'll can comment in its FA review in a week or two. If you have any feedback, please drop me a line on my talk page. OH! and how about that baseball team?!?! Gig 'em! — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back

Well, I've gone and done it and the Aggie Band article is up for Featured Article status. Any feedback (especially support) would be greatly appreciated. — BQZip01 — ^talk 08:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Texas A&M Wikiproject

Starting the groundwork for a Texas A&M wikiproject. I can't promise ill be active in it. I am sure future aggie wikipedians will pick it up. I just made a list of wikipedia entries that are a&m related. please add on, and organize. Talk:Texas_A&M_University/WPPrep as for the project itself. I think i will start it once Karanacs comes back. Wikipedia:WikiProject Proposed it with the wikiproject council. Put your name down if you are interested in joining Proposal Gig em Oldag07 03:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Texas A&M, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Texas A&M. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Oldag07 06:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance

As someone with whom I have reviewed or worked with on an article or talk page, I humbly request your assistance in reviewing the Aggie Bonfire page for Featured Article status. Any/all constructive input is welcomed and appreciated on the FAC nomination page, but please read the instructions for reviewing before you make a comment. Thanks in advance for your assistance. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TexasAggie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TexasAggie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/USER discussion concerning (ThreeE)

Hello, Hut101. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning ThreeE's conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by "ThreeE" in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/ThreeE, where I would appreciate your participation and comments. — BQZip01 — ^talk 12:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh oh

Well, I've decided to apply to join the dark side. As a user with whom I have interacted, I would appreciate your input on my nomination. This is not a request for support, though any support would be appreciated, but simply a request for feedback. — BQZip01 — ^talk 03:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Hut101

Hello Hut101. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Hut101, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: U1 cannot be applied to talk pages. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Send an e-mail message to User:Oversight with the specific diffs that you want removed from the Talk page history, and they can delete them. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]