User talk:HussarZwei

Welcome!

Hello, HussarZwei, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 01:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Improper categorizations

Hello. Can you stop adding ridiculous categories like "Jewish fascists" to Dave Rubin [1], "Far-right politics in the United Kingdom" to Margaret Thatcher [2], "Far-right politics in the United States" to Tulsi Gabbard [3], "White supremacy" to Category:White culture etc.

These categories violate WP:NPOV and some also WP:BLP. Additionally, categories have to be defining characters of the topic per WP:CATDEF and they need to be supported by reliable sources in-text! I will be reverting many of these changes. --Pudeo (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read these discretionary sanctions alerts before you edit again

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also considering blocking you

I need a very good explanation of these two edits.[4] Doug Weller talk 13:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: this user was also improperly categorizing multiple other articles. Hypoxine (talk) 06:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for BLP violations, but mainly as a precaution with the understanding that a satisfactory explanation of their edits, particularly the two I linked, should result in an unblock..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]