User talk:Hurrygane

Archives

Question

If you do not mind. I ask: why you leafe Wikipedia? Your edits were good. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hurrygane. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo from Real Madrid C.F. to Juventus F.C.

Hello, Hurrygane,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo from Real Madrid C.F. to Juventus F.C. should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo from Real Madrid C.F. to Juventus F.C. .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Templates with commented out categories

I noticed you created these three templates with commented out categories: Template:HIFK sections, Template:Turun Palloseura sections, and Template:Ilves sections. It seems likely this is not what you meant to do. Retro (talk | contribs) 23:28, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, it appears you're currently inactive from Wikipedia. I will handle the comments myself. Retro (talk | contribs) 23:37, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurrygane. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurrygane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This matter was resolved peacefully after a thorough investigation on the Finnish Wikipedia. Despite five years of experience, I admit to being unfamiliar with Wikipedia guidelines regarding sock puppetry, but do not deny any wrongdoing. It is true that I have used multiple accounts for constructive contributions. However, I must say I never intended to breach Wikipedia's policies. I understand what I am blocked for, and I will not do it again. I'd like to proceed with using my alternative accounts by marking them with Template:User alternative account banner. I would be happy to deactivate this account as per Wikipedia:Clean start. Thank you very much for your consideration. Hurrygane (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can see your accounts having fake interactions here. Votestacking here. Tag-team edit warring here. This just seems to be run-of-the-mill abusive sock-puppeting - not "constructive" or unintentional. Kuru (talk) 03:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurrygane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would argue that my case wasn't "run-of-the-mill abusive sock-puppeting", as claimed above.

As per Wikipedia:Clean start, I practically stopped using this account in November 2018. This was after one potentially promising article I created was removed from the Finnish Wikipedia — simultaneously with me being stripped of my pending changes reviewer rights — following a white lie and poor damage control that followed. For that reason, I started afresh by creating four new accounts each of which had a specific "role" assigned to them.

As for the aforementioned incident of fake interactions, I must say that I tried to edit the article Matthijs De Ligt by Hurrygane (the only editor with the extended confirmed user access level), but my revision was undone due to lack of references. Hence I thought that the best course of action would be to return to the starting point and to request edits via new user whose focus is/was on adding references. New user being Ref-checking. I thought that I had tagged the user that had had previously reversed the edit, but since they, possibly unintentionally, ignored my request, I once more deployed Hurrygane. (As for the second request, The one who creates pages got a new section out of it. As silly as it sounds, before its deactivation TOWCP's onus was to take part in AfDs, to move pages and to create articles, redirects, sections, and talk pages.)

It was an obnoxious mistake. I deeply regret it.

As I mentioned before, I was absolved of intentional wrongdoing after a thorough investigation on the Finnish Wikipedia. I have been cooperative with authorities here as well. For full transparency, I'd like to point out that I stacked votes on deletion discussion about Transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo from Real Madrid C.F. to Juventus F.C. too. Despite five years of experience, I admit to being unfamiliar with Wikipedia guidelines regarding sock puppetry. I do not deny any wrongdoing. I am, and always have been, a fool, and I realize that my actions eroded the sanctity/reliablility of this website.

I would like to point out that my contributions, for the most part, have been constructive. This claim is supported by data presented by Toolforge, according to which, only 6.34 percent of my edits have been deleted (the quotient decreases to 5.80 without TOWCP). After I semi-retired this account in 2018, Dawid2009 wondered why I did that even though "my edits were good".

I have already refrained from making any edits for four months. I understand what I am blocked for, and I will not do it again. I cannot stress this enough. (That cliché disgusts me but it's true.) I'm here to build an encyclopedia. (More on this below.) I'd like to help Wikipedia to improve. I'd like to make it less vulnerable.

What constructive edits do I want to make if unblocked?
At List of career achievements by Cristiano Ronaldo:

I would add three refs <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.beinsports.com/us/serie-a/news/ronaldo-equals-batistuta-and-quagliarella-in-/1419239 |title=Ronaldo Equals Batistuta and Quagliarella In Serie A Record Books |publisher=[[beIN Sports]] |date=22 February 2020 |accessdate=25 June 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Burton |first=Chris |url=https://www.goal.com/en/news/ronaldo-matches-batistuta-quagliarella-as-juventus-goal-glut/1jvwq0s148xo31kzk8ccj71z5m |title=Ronaldo matches Batistuta & Quagliarella as Juventus goal glut continues |work=[[Goal (website)|Goal]] |date=22 February 2020 |accessdate=25 June 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51598794 |title=SPAL 1-2 Juventus: Cristiano Ronaldo scores in win to equal Serie A record in 1,000th game |work=[[BBC Online]] |publisher=[[BBC Sport]] |date=22 February 2020 |accessdate=25 June 2020}}</ref> to the Italian records table.
I would add one (former) record and two refs |- | |Most assists in Real Madrid history: 131 assists{{efn|Since surpassed by [[Karim Benzema]] on 9 February 2019.}} |<ref>{{cite web |title=Benzema meilleur passeur de l’histoire du Real |url=https://www.sports.fr/football/benzema-meilleur-passeur-de-lhistoire-real-325355.html |date=9 February 2020 |accessdate=19 February 2020 |last=Sagorin |first=Yannick |website=Sports.fr |language=French}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Benzema Breaks All-Time Real Record, Overtakes CR7 |url=https://www.soccerladuma.co.za/news/articles/international/categories/international/karim-benzema-breaks-all-time-real-madrid-record-overtakes-cristiano-ronaldo/672960 |date=11 February 2020 |accessdate=19 February 2020 |author=SL International |work=Soccer Laduma}}</ref> to the Former records table.
I would undo revision 940779164 by 41.190.2.218 (talk) because the edit contradicts the content of the source.
I would add two refs <ref>{{cite web|last=Wittenberg|first=Daniel|author-link=|title=Cristiano Ronaldo’s sister hits out at Maurizio Sarri after Juventus' Coppa Italia defeat|url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/cristiano-ronaldos-sister-hits-out-22216609|work=Daily Mirror|date=19 June 2020|access-date=24 June 2020|quote=In a post accompanied by a series of photos of her brother looking forlornly at his runners-up medal in an empty Stadio Olimpico, Aveiro wrote: ‘What more can you do? You did everything you could, my darling. You can’t work miracles by yourself. I don’t understand how they can play like this. Anyway, keep your chin up, but you can’t do it all, my king.’}}</ref> and {{cite book|last=Oldfield|first=Matt|author-link=|title=Cristiano Ronaldo|edition=|publisher=John Blake Publishing|location=London, England|year=2009|isbn=9781843586883|ref=harv|origyear=2008}}, and also three footnotes {{efn|Runners-up receive medals in the European Championship.}}, {{efn|Though there was no third place playoff, UEFA decided in the 2012 edition to award the semi-final losers ([[Germany national football team|Germany]] and Portugal) bronze medals for the first time.}} and {{efn|Runners-up received medals in the Coppa Italia.}} to the Collective awards table.
I would undo revision 942436576 by 37.15.87.125 (talk) because the edit is a probable case of self-promotion.
I would fix the table that is under the heading of Italian records.

At Arthur Melo:

I would add one sentence During his time at Barcelona, he has come under criticism, however, from Robbie Dunne, [[Luis Suárez (footballer, born 1935)|Luis Suárez]], and [[Ernesto Valverde]], among others, for his apparent tendency to play it safe and reluctance to pass the ball in the direction that the offensive team is trying to move towards, the opposition's goal line. and one ref <ref>{{cite web |last=Dunne |first=Robbie |url=https://hayliga.com/arthur-barcelona-tactics-interior/ |title=Arthur Melo and the demands of a Barcelona interior |work=Hay Liga |date=25 June 2020 |accessdate=25 June 2020}}</ref> to the Style of play section.

At These Football Times:

I would update their Alexa rank.

At Football Paradise:

I would update their Alexa rank. Hurrygane (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree that this was "run-of-the-mill abusive sock-puppeting". The standard offer is six months. Part of the standard offer is proving that you can follow simple instructions, such as "wait six months". If you can't follow a rule as simple as that, we have no reason to believe that you will follow "don't abuse multiple accounts". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hurrygane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the day I've been waiting for. After two rejected unblock requests in the first four months, I'm now applying for standard offer. For full disclosure, I'd like to say that during these six months I've been active in the Finnish Wikipedia. That technically should not affect or be detrimental to my request here. I must say, however, that since this incident took place, I haven't caused any issues there, and I've even been given new rights. I do hope that you will see this as an encouraging sign going forward. Hurrygane (talk) 12:48 am, 7 August 2020, Friday (11 days ago) (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Appears to have been productive at another wiki and agrees to stay with one account here. only (talk) 01:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What account did you use to edit Finnish Wikipedia as this one doesn't seem to have edited there since 2018. only (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Only: I have used my sockpuppets. Using (marked) alternative accounts there is not wrong per se, only if it is ill-intentioned. I was able to convince the Finnish administrators that this was not the case. Hurrygane (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell us which accounts? If you were productive at another wiki, it can be helpful for us to see those edits to support your second chance. only (talk) 14:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic data processor, Ref-checking, Grammar-Whizz, and The one who creates pages. Hurrygane (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If unblocked here, do you agree to only utilize one account? NinjaRobotPirate, as a CU who reviewed the block here previously, do you have any concerns about an unblock? only (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The blocking CU is retired, unfortunately. There doesn't seem to have been any block evasion, so I'd be OK with unblocking. I think a one-account restriction sounds like a good idea. That would be appealable at WP:AN like any other unblock condition. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would be childish of me to say that I do not agree to only contribute via this account. So, of course, that wouldn't pose a problem for me at all. Could I still mention in my user page that I have utilized the aforementioned sockpuppets in the past? Hurrygane (talk) 19:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fine to note them. only (talk) 01:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking request

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I have been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry, and User:Kuru has reviewed and declined my (first) unblock request. However, they seem to have overlooked User:SeJokaLoiArtikkelinKielivähemmistötSuomessa which is one of my alternative accounts. I request that that account be blocked as well. Hurrygane (talk) 09:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I have removed your edit requests; while blocked, you can only use this page to request unblock. You cannot use it to edit by proxy. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Hurrygane (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Is there a way to suggest edits and refs in Wikipedia, even if I am blocked? This inquiry is not an official unblock request. Hurrygane (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. If you want to edit or otherwise suggest edits, you must make a successful unblock request. You cannot request that others make edits for you, or create additional accounts, as that would defeat the purpose of the block. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of career achievements by Cristiano Ronaldo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission error

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I recently utilized The one who creates pages at another wiki. After creating one article, I logged out and used another account. Then I logged out for the second time, and started editing with this user, for the other two are blocked here. However, when I tried to edit I was hit with a block notice. Despite signing in and out numerous times and despite waiting for around half an hour, the English Wikipedia claims, for whatever reason, that I try to edit from The one who creates pages‬ which has been blocked (disabled). I am currently unable to edit Wikipedia. I am still able to view pages, but not currently able to edit, move, or create them even though Hurrygane is no longer blocked. A month ago, my unblock request was reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request. I've edited Wikipedia since. This is a technical issue. I need your assistance. Hurrygane (talk) 10:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been automatically blocked for 24 hours for using the account, theoretically violating the agreement, albeit accidentally. The block will automatically expire after this time. To prevent the issue from re-occurring, please do not open the English Wikipedia while logged into your blocked account again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. Hurrygane (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opponent teams

He has scored 740 goals not 732 so that list is not correct and complete Alessandraronaldo (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I talk about Cristiano Ronaldo achievements Alessandraronaldo (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, accoording to many websites like messivsronaldo, or michelacosta, Ronaldo has provided 219 assists throughout his career and 119 with Real Madrid Alessandraronaldo (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of most expensive and valuable assets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most expensive and valuable assets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most expensive and valuable assets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ronaldo polls and assists

Why did you delete Ronaldo's polls and assists, from a valid source? If you search for Ronaldo assists on every websites it will be 222. Alessandraronaldo (talk) 11:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added Ballon d'Or Dream Team

I just added him included in the Ballon d'Or Dream Team Alessandraronaldo (talk) 17:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Délicieuse Musique

Hello, Hurrygane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Délicieuse Musique".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ronaldo

The Week is not a valid source, and according to it Ronaldo has 169 appearances with Portugal while he really has 170. Sorry for my English Alessandraronaldo (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of novels considered the greatest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of novels considered the greatest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of novels considered the greatest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Originaldo" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Originaldo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § Originaldo until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Eleven of Hearts" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eleven of Hearts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § Eleven of Hearts until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"God's team" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect God's team has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § God's team until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]