User talk:Hurry up Sally
Welcome!
[edit]
|
July 2020
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Basukinath has been reverted.
Your edit here to Basukinath was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.mapsofindia.com/india/where-is-basukinath.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]Hi. Your editing pattern shows indications of paid editing. Please review our guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest and please review WP:PAID – you have to declare who is paying you on your userpage. Paid articles must be submitted for review with Articles for Creation – I've therefore moved your article to Draft:Gorilla Trades where you can continue working on it and submit it for review (after you've explained what your conflict of interest is). – Thjarkur (talk) 20:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Opsani
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Opsani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seagull123 Φ 12:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to John Maloney (archaeologist), give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Hurry up Sally, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hurry up Sally|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Captain Calm (talk) 13:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Articles moved to draft
[edit]Your editing pattern shows indications of paid editing, yet you haven't replied to a previous request for disclosure. Please review our guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest and in particular please review WP:PAID – you have to declare who is paying you on your userpage. Paid articles must be submitted for review with Articles for Creation – I've therefore moved the following articles to draft:
You can continue working on them and submit them for review (after you've explained what your conflict of interest is). Captain Calm (talk) 13:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.