User talk:Huo Ma Ke

Speedy deletion of Hostile Intent

A tag has been placed on Hostile Intent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Acroterion _(talk) 02:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article.

Yes, I read it, and its history. The article has been deleted several times before, once as a result of an AfD. Did you read Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? before posting your *message* to me? --Bradeos Graphon 02:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't decide it was irrelevant, this Wikipedia consensus process

[1] did...

A new article would still have to satisfy the objections to the old article, notability established by WP:V & WP:RS. --Bradeos Graphon 12:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said just above, get some secondary sources, magazine or newspaper articles, online or print, to reference what you want to say about it and it will be good to go. I don't have anything against the idea of a good article on the subject personally, my objection was completely technical, based on the history and prose style I saw. For one example of a typical red flag, in your latest article you mentioned that the participants were a "tight knit group", that is what led me to view the thing with suspicion (that and the former AfD finding and csd request), because it seems like original research on your part. Get your article well documented from independently reliable, verifiable sources; write in the academic passive voice and no one will be able to touch it. Good luck! --Bradeos Graphon 01:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Uor-logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Uor-logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Uor-logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Uor-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]