User talk:Hunter3606

Hello, Hunter3606, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! LoudLizard (talk) (contribs) 12:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC) LoudLizard (talk) (contribs) 12:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter3606, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hunter3606! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Draft:Harvey Boulter page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvey Boulter (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The article is supposedly about Boulter, but in fact the majority of it is not about him but about Porton. You must decide, because the article cannot be about both. Also, I sense a point of view here as the article seems to wish to show Porton in its best light - which is one-sided. The article must be neutral in its view of the subject. In particular I am concerned about the information about the lawsuit, which appears to be presented here in a biased manner, evidenced by statements like "without making any reference to the contractual commitments" which is taken verbatim (note: that's a copyright violation) from a press release from the lawyers for Porton (press releases are not acceptable sources because they are by nature promoting a point of view). And you've already been told to remove press releases by earlier reviewers. If you continue to push a point of view, the article can be summarily deleted, as this violates WP policy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harvey Boulter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 07:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]