User talk:Hunter10039

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Go Futurama! Us e r:Sp3000 21:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Template:Underconstruction/doc has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks Werdan7^{T @} 03:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addison's

Your additions to the Addison's disease article are far from helpful, and I have therefore removed them. You really need to get a handle on how you want your contributions to make the article better. Let me take you through the last few edits:

Sources should be from reliable publications, ideally reviews in high-quality journals. This is especially important in a well-researched condition that has the disadvantage of having protean symptoms and some anecdotal features. Web-based sources tend to be less useful here. It matters not that they are NIH-based; they are often themselves unsourced.
Anecdotal reports ("a young boy recently died in UK") are not suitable for an encyclopedia.
You need to pay attention to spelling and grammar.

WP:HOW is a general introduction to Wikipedia editing. WP:FN explains how to do footnotes, and I would encourage the use of WP:CIT (citation templates). WP:MEDMOS shows a general outline and style advice for medical articles, and WP:MEDRS provides guidance on sources. JFW | T@lk 11:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

Please make sure that your edits are gramatically correct and supported by useful sources, ideally sources that meet WP:MEDRS. I have seen no real improvement since my message above. JFW | T@lk 08:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]