User talk:Hummusapiens

Cool user name :)

Hi Hummusapiens! Welcome to Wikipedia and have fun editing (constructively)! Yekshemesh (talk) 13:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Imperial Harem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Montagu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gi DPL bot. I said in the talk page of Ottoman Imperial Harem that I was unsure which Mary Montagu the text was talking about. I did not recieve a response. Hummusapiens (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it wrong to link to a disambiguation page? Hummusapiens (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Bogazicili (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did I do something wrong? Hummusapiens (talk) 06:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adana

In your edit, you claimed Adana is derived from Atana [1]. I did a search in the book and the only information I could find about Atana is on page xiii. It just gives different versions of place names, in English, Ottoman, Turkish, and others. It doesn't say which one is the original and which one is the one the others derived from. Bogazicili (talk) 14:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bogazicili hello! I also saw it also in page XIII, since there was a Greek or Armeninan presence before an English/Turkish/Ottoman. I wrote this. Maybe I am mistaken to have done this? Hummusapiens (talk) 06:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You shouldn't assume unless the source says so. For more information, see WP:Original research and WP:SYNTH. Adana could have been derived from Hittites or something older. Bogazicili (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you're right. Thanks for pointing out the Wikipedia rules to me. Appreciated. Hummusapiens (talk) 06:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Hummusapiens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Bogazicili (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Hummusapiens (talk) 06:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]