User talk:Humbug26

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

I'm a newbie (just joined yesterday). Primary reason for joining is to fix spelling errors that I'm seeing during searches. I decided to try "seperate" as my first attempt. I cleaned up some articles. My concern is on two articles: Shastri Sisters and Daqing, both of which have more things wrong than just the misspelling, especially the first article. Just how much can I edit without possibly annoying creator of article?

[[User:Humbug26|Humbug26}} (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Humbug26:, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your contributions so far. What you should know is that wikipedia is a collaborative project and this means that nobody has 'ownership' of any page (for more about this see WP:Ownership_of_content). This means that you are not only allowed but encouraged to boldly edit articles to improve them by adding or changing material according to wikipedia's various content guidelines (for more on this see Wikipedia:Be_bold). Occasionally all editors will come across a situation where they make an edit that they think is an improvement to an article, but other editors disagree. In these circumstances it is correct for the other editor to revert the edit that was made. Do not let this discourage you, it is intended only as a way to start discussion on the talkpage of the article to see whether there is consensus amongst editors and whether compromises can be made to get content that everyone is happy with. Do not be afraid to make changes, you may find that other readers of the article will appreciate the improvements and just not have known how to make them themselves. I will add a welcome message to your talkpage after this which will provide some helpful links as you begin to edit. My own favourite is Help:Cheatsheet. Perhaps too you might consider the tutorial available at WP:TUTORIAL which might give some pointers on the important principles of verification - if you provide references to independent reliable sources to back up any editors you make, then you are sure not to go too far wrong. One thing to be wary of on those sort of articles about TV programs is that there is a tendency for writers to add too much in the way of detailed plot summaries etc which do not cite any independent sources - it is understandable if people are fans of the show they will get a little carried away, but encyclopedias tend to look more in summary at the important bits rather than everything. If you encounter any queries, don't hesitate to ask again with the help me template, someone will surely be along to offer assistance. Best wishes --ℕ ℱ 20:07, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Humbug26! Thank you for your contributions. I am Nonsenseferret and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ℕ ℱ 20:07, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Humbug26, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Humbug26! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Links to fadedpage.com

I, personally, don't think that these links to a Canadian website are acceptable for Wikipedia. I posed a question about such links previously at User talk:Moonriddengirl/Archive 59#Public domain elsewhere than in the U.S. Moonriddengirl is something of a copyright specialist at wp.en, and I think that her take should be given great weight; unless a work is public domain in its country of origin, I don't think we should be linking to a site offering a copy of the text. Deor (talk) 22:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Deor (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Humbug26. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Humbug26. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Humbug26. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]