User talk:Humanitarian22

June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to History of Christianity. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DarkAudit 01:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to History of Christianity, you will be blocked from editing. DarkAudit 01:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had you actually viewed the article you'd see that it absolutely *NOT* vandalism and very much on topic - you are the vandal here.

Acharya S

Discussed your change here. ^^James^^ 20:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding:"I'm getting the sense that Wikipedia is bias & will always side with Christianity no matter what."

Wikipedia is edited by volunteers. Anyone can edit. In theory, the "management" isn't here to help determine content, but to referee disputes. It's up to everyone to work together to craft factual encyclopedic articles. Most if not all articles are considered "works in progress". In practice, especially on controversial topics such as the Jesus Myth, it's often an endless battle of wills against staunch ideologues. (Not to mention selective enforcement of policy etc. etc.) Of course, I'm sure much of this happens beneath the conscious radar.

Wikipedia is a tremendous energy sink. The articles are always changing. Some call this "collaboration". I wouldn't call it that.

I do appreciate many aspects of wikipedia. But it can only be as good as the people participating. It is not elitist in that sense.

Anyways, welcome to the "game" of wikipedia! ^^James^^ 01:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Astrotheology, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Wildthing61476 14:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://tribes.tribe.net/solarmythologynastrotheology was *MY* creation and I was just getting started. It was not necessary to delete this page before it was finished.

The only "patent nonsense" I see comes from wikipeida's "speedy deletion" tactic deleting material they disagree with and don't like. I supplied a dictionary definition for you and you still didn't get it.

Astrotheology - "\As`tro*the*ol"o*gy\, n. [Astro- + theology.] Theology founded on observation or knowledge of the celestial bodies." http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/astrotheology

Archaeoastronomy - "the branch of archaeology that deals with the apparent use by prehistoric civilizations of astronomical techniques to establish the seasons or the cycle of the year, esp. as evidenced in the construction of megaliths and other ritual structures." http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/archaeoastronomy

You might want to read WP:DICT then, as Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. Also, if this is something you created, you will have to show reliable sources where this is notable. Wildthing61476 15:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While the article was tagged as "patent nonsense", that is not why it was deleted -- it was deleted for being a copyright violation, per WP:CSD#G11. Furthermore, this article violates our policies concerning original research; you'd have to provide ample references from reliable sources documenting this phenomenon. Please keep in mind that articles should not merely synthesize sources to make a point; the sources themselves should demonstrate the article's subject. -- Merope 15:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam links

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Merope 15:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]