User talk:Humanengr

Talk to me

Interview request

My name is Daniel, and I’m a senior at Harvard University currently writing an undergraduate thesis about Wikipedia. I’m particularly interested in how the Wikipedia community decides what facts are relevant and/or notable enough to warrant inclusion on a particular article — especially in regards to articles on contentious topics.

I noticed that you’ve been quite active editing the “COVID-19 pandemic” article over the past few months. So, would you mind if I send you a few questions (via email or right here) about your work editing that article, and the approach that you take? I’d really love to hear from you.

Thanks so much! --Dalorleon (talk) 16:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking in again, Humanengr! I'd love to ask you some questions about your editing work for Wikipedia. Let me know if you're available. If not, no worries! --Dalorleon (talk) 16:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You did not receive a response to this question. Did you find the help you needed?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for checking; issue sufficiently resolved for the moment; will re-ask for help as needed. Humanengr (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search for Truth by Natural Light has been accepted

The Search for Truth by Natural Light, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsi Gabbard political positions inquiry

Hey Humanengr, I saw your message you left on my talk page about taking a look at Tulsi Gabbards political positions, could you clarify for me what I need to look at, I would love to give some notes and help shape up that article. Eruditess (talk) 19:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eruditess, Excellent! I've actually started one approach on this sandbox, where I've been paring down a copy of the existing Pol pos page, removing pretty much all the quotes and trimming material such as that which is sourced only to congress.gov. (I've only pared from the start of the Domestic positions § through Health Care.)

You're welcome to edit that draft into shape to merge onto the bio page to make it conform more to the extent to which Buttigieg, Harris, and Sanders cover their pol pos page mat'l on their bio pages. Does that make sense? (UPDATE: I appended the bio page pol pos § so we have that handy.) Humanengr (talk) 21:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eruditess, I'd welcome your thoughts when you have time. Humanengr (talk) 19:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a second version, regrouping under the 6 headings from 1/14/2019 (shortly after campaign announcement). Next step is probably a bit more lower-level rearrangement and further paring. Humanengr (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eruditess, I'm thinking now of splitting the bio page Pol Pos § into 3 main sub-§§: Foreign policy, Domestic issues, Governance, with a 4th for Trump administration. Do you have any thoughts on the following:

A Foreign policy § structured like this?
A Domestic issues § consisting of these §§ in addition to the ones currently on the bio page (Drug policy and criminal justice reform; Environment; Healthcare and GMO labeling; LGBT issues)?
A Governance § like this?
A Trump administration § like this?

The other main issue of course is which and how much of this material should be added.

Coming at this from the other end, I’m gonna see what can be cleaned up on the existing bio page in advance of whatever might be added from the above.

Humanengr (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No 2A12:A301:1000:0:0:0:0:2057 (talk) 21:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TrangaBellam (talk) 12:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]