User talk:Huigary
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Huigary, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
The overall wiki article on Anaerobic Respiration provided a neutral and a decent format guiding the readers from the scientific processes to its real-world importance. The article presented headings ordered by themes providing multiple aspects on the topic such as the contrast between anaerobic respiration to Fermentation and the importance in real-world economically and ecologically. The lead section presented an adequate summary of the topic stating the molecules of interest, drawing comparison to its counterpart Aerobic Respiration, and explaining where Anaerobic Respiration occurs, which was easy to understand. However, the lack of diagrams inhibited a clearer understanding of the important such as the Electron Transport Chain (ETC) and the comparison to Fermentation. Though there were links to their page, immediate visuals would improve the audiences understanding. In addition, some sentences appeared to be inconcise with extra words causing the reader to be unclear as seen in the second sentence in the opening paragraph. The section about Fermentation and Anaerobic Respiration distinctions should immediately be highlighted in the first sentence to inform the audience that they are not synonymous instead of the ending paragraph as it was unclear why they were being compared. Overall, the information presented appeared accurate and provided sufficient scientific insight to present the topic of anaerobic respiration for the general audience. References were correctly cited from reliable sources such as scientific journals and articles, however many paragraphs presented no citation which can be seen throughout the article.
Huigary (talk) 16:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)